Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Tesla Model 3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 31700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Tesla Model 3?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Tesla Model 3 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 31700 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1466 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 performs decisively better – achieving up to 750 km, about 370 km more than the Alpine A290.
Model 3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 has a decisively edge – offering 460 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 242 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs noticeable better – reaching 262 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 92 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model 3 pulls decisively stronger with 660 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is to a small extent lighter – 1554 kg compared to 1772 kg. The difference is around 218 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers decisively more room – 594 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 barely noticeable takes the win – 396 kg compared to 377 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model 3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £31,700
Tesla Model 3
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
Tesla Model 3
3.6 (3 Reviews)
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
Alpine A290
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
31700 - 50100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
83 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
1772 - 1929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4724 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
303 - 377 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
262 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.