@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Tesla, Inc.
VS

Alpine A290 vs Tesla Model 3 – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Tesla Model 3.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Alpine A290 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Tesla Model 3 costs 34300 £. That’s a price difference of around 1106 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.60 kWh.

As for range, the Tesla Model 3 performs decisively better – achieving up to 750 km, about 370 km more than the Alpine A290.

Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 has a decisively edge – offering 460 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 242 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs noticeable better – reaching 262 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 92 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model 3 pulls decisively stronger with 660 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is to a small extent lighter – 1554 kg compared to 1822 kg. The difference is around 268 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers decisively more room – 594 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.

When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 a bit takes the win – 396 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Tesla Model 3 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Tesla Model 3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £34,300
Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.2 - 16.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 550 - 750 km
details

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Tesla Model 3

1 (1)
rate

The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.

details
0x0-Model3_06 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_RHD_03 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_12 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_09 @ Tesla, Inc.

Top Car Comparisons

@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Tesla Model 3 and the Skoda Elroq, the electric sedan showcases Tesla's cutting-edge technology and impressive range, making it a formidable contender in the EV market. Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq impresses with its spacious interior and practicality, …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia EV3
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the battle of electric sedans, the Kia EV6 emerges as a compelling competitor against the ever-popular Tesla Model 3. With its sleek design, advanced technology, and impressive range, the EV6 offers a strong alternative for drivers seeking both performance and practicality. While the Model 3 …
Alpine A290
Tesla Model 3
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
34300 - 50100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1554 kg
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
594 L
Length
3990 mm
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
Width
1820 mm
Width
1850 mm
Height
1520 mm
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
303 - 333 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Tesla

Similar Comparisons

@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Atto 3
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the electric vehicle showdown between the BYD Atto 3 and the Tesla Model 3, both models offer compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The Atto 3 impresses with its affordability and range, making it an attractive choice for those seeking value without sacrificing performance. Meanwhile, …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless …
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
Unsure whether the Polestar 4 or the Tesla Model 3 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Tavascan
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the battle of electric vehicles, the CUPRA Tavascan stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to enthusiasts who crave performance. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 continues to lead with its remarkable range and advanced tech features, making it a top …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the battle of retro charm versus modern innovation, the Renault R5 brings a nostalgic touch to urban driving, boasting its compact design and playful aesthetics. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 showcases cutting-edge technology and impressive electric range, appealing to those seeking …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Octavia Combi
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
Skoda Octavia Combi and Tesla Model 3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ smart Europe GmbH
smart #3
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
The smart #3 and Tesla Model 3 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.