VS

Alpine A290 vs Tesla Model 3 comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 31,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Tesla Model 3?

Alpine A290 vs Tesla Model 3: Key differences

Alpine A290

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit lighter

Tesla Model 3

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Tesla Model 3 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 31,700 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,466 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model 3 is noticeably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the Alpine A290. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 750 km, about 370 km more than the Alpine A290.

Model 3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers substantially more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 242 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Tesla Model 3 is noticeably faster – reaching 262 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 92 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Tesla Model 3 delivers substantially more torque with 660 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is a bit lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 1,772 kg. The difference is around 218 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers significantly more boot space – 594 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.

When it comes to payload, the Alpine A290 carries only slightly more – 396 kg compared to 377 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,700
Model 3

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 16.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 534 - 750 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
CUPRA Born
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the rapidly evolving landscape of electric vehicles, the CUPRA Born and Tesla Model 3 stand out as formidable contenders. The CUPRA Born offers a dynamic driving experience with its sporty design and impressive agility, making it a compelling choice for those seeking a blend of practicality and …
Alpine A290
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.

details
0x0-Model3_06
0x0-Model3_RHD_03
0x0-Model3_12
0x0-Model3_09

Reviews Tesla Model 3

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
dino999
18 Nov 2025, 08:47:05

I wanted to give 0 stars but you can't — unfortunately, it sucks.

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Kia EV3
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the battle of electric sedans, the Kia EV6 emerges as a compelling competitor against the ever-popular Tesla Model 3. With its sleek design, advanced technology, and impressive range, the EV6 offers a strong alternative for drivers seeking both performance and practicality. While the Model 3 …
Tesla Model 3
XPeng P7
VS
Unsure whether the Tesla Model 3 or the XPeng P7 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Tesla Model 3
Skoda Elroq
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Tesla Model 3 and the Skoda Elroq, the electric sedan showcases Tesla's cutting-edge technology and impressive range, making it a formidable contender in the EV market. Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq impresses with its spacious interior and practicality, …
CUPRA Tavascan
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the battle of electric vehicles, the CUPRA Tavascan stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to enthusiasts who crave performance. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 continues to lead with its remarkable range and advanced tech features, making it a top …
Ford Capri
Tesla Model 3
VS
In a captivating clash of iconic eras, the Ford Capri brings a wave of nostalgia with its classic coupe design and retro charm, reminding enthusiasts of a time when driving was all about raw, unfiltered mechanics. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 catapults us into the future, boasting …
Ford Explorer EV
Tesla Model 3
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Explorer EV or the Tesla Model 3 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault R5
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the battle of retro charm versus modern innovation, the Renault R5 brings a nostalgic touch to urban driving, boasting its compact design and playful aesthetics. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 showcases cutting-edge technology and impressive electric range, appealing to those seeking …
Alpine A290
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
31,700 - 50,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
83 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,772 - 1,929 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
594 L
Length
3,990 mm
Length
4,724 mm
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
1,520 mm
Height
1,431 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,106 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
303 - 377 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
262 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Tesla
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.