Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model 3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 34300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Tesla Model 3?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Tesla Model 3 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34300 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3780 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Tesla Model 3: with 13.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Skoda Enyaq with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 performs evident better – achieving up to 750 km, about 163 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Model 3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 has a evident edge – offering 460 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 262 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 82 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls slight stronger with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is slight lighter – 1822 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers slight more room – 594 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq noticeable takes the win – 509 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 176 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Tesla Model 3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Tesla Model 3
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Tesla Model 3
3.6 (3 Reviews)
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
Skoda Enyaq
Tesla Model 3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
34300 - 50100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
303 - 333 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.