VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model 3 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 31,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Tesla Model 3?

Skoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model 3: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
details

Tesla Model 3

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq VS Tesla Model 3 — quick take

Skoda Enyaq VS Tesla Model 3 set up a familiar trade-off: the Enyaq prioritises space, calm and everyday practicality, while the Model 3 pushes efficiency, software and a sharper driving feel. The Enyaq arrives with the composure of an SUV that’s designed to swallow motorway miles with minimal fuss; the Model 3 answers with laser-focused range efficiency and a tech ecosystem that trims time at the charger. For many buyers the choice is emotional as much as rational — do you want a reassuringly roomy cruiser or a minimalist, efficiency-first saloon? In this comparison we focus on how those differences play out in real life rather than on headline figures. Read on to see which car suits routine commutes, family trips and long-distance work travel better.

Model 3

Driving character and day-to-day dynamics

The Skoda Enyaq feels like a relaxed, heavy-weight cruiser: steering is light, responses steady and the whole car encourages calm progress rather than enthusiastic cornering, while the Tesla Model 3 feels taut, immediate and much more willing to change direction quickly. Model 3 rewards drivers who like crisp turn-in and punchy throttle response, and its regenerative braking and agile chassis make urban manoeuvres feel lively. Enyaq’s weight and softer pedal/steering setup translate into a reassuring, steady ride that soothes rather than excites—good for long-distance commuting but less fun on twisty roads. Both cars are predictable and safe, but the emotional tone differs: measured comfort from the Enyaq versus engaged efficiency from the Model 3. Your preference for sportiness or serenity will determine which one feels more natural every day.

Enyaq

Comfort and long-distance behaviour

On long runs the Skoda Enyaq makes itself felt as the quieter, more restful companion with generous rear room and a trunk shaped to accept real luggage without fuss, whereas the Tesla Model 3 leverages its efficiency and Supercharger integration to shorten recharge stress but delivers a firmer, less cocooned ride. The Enyaq’s suspension and cabin insulation let occupants arrive less tired after motorway stints, especially if you regularly carry three across the back seat. Model 3 has made notable gains in noise and ride quality and still wins on energy economy and charging convenience, but taller passengers or those needing lots of luggage will notice the Enyaq’s space advantage. If you live for long trips and passenger comfort, the Enyaq tilts the balance; if you prioritise fewer stops and lower running costs, the Model 3 will feel smarter on route.

Model 3

Practicality and everyday usability

Practicality is where the Skoda Enyaq plays its strongest hand: wide rear doors, a flat floor and a large, easy-to-pack luggage bay make family life and weekend gear-hauling straightforward, while the Tesla Model 3’s sedan layout keeps overall footprint compact but limits loading flexibility. The Enyaq’s cabin storage and thoughtful details are aimed at people who use their car as a tool — child seats, crates and bulky suitcases all fit with less juggling. Model 3 compensates with smart software aids, a usable frunk and generally clever ergonomics, yet its narrow rear bench and smaller hatch opening change the kind of items you can carry without awkward angling. In short, Enyaq is built around physical space; Model 3 optimises the trip through tech and packaging trade-offs.

Enyaq

Cabin feel, controls and tech ecosystem

The Skoda Enyaq presents a more conventional, material-focused cabin with tactile switches and a familiar layout that will please buyers who prefer buttons and obvious ergonomics, while the Tesla Model 3 is unapologetically minimalist and software-led, turning many functions over to a single screen. Enyaq’s trim choices and practical cubbyholes create a sense of everyday quality and usability, but its touchscreen can feel slower and options are sometimes locked behind higher-spec packs. Model 3’s interface is fast, updates over the air and ties seamlessly into charging and navigation, yet the touch-first control philosophy can frustrate those who miss physical climate or shortcut knobs. Put simply: Enyaq favours tangible comfort and ease-of-use; Model 3 favours software polish and rapid evolution — your tolerance for touch controls will be decisive.

Model 3

Who should consider each car — buyer fit and trade-offs

If your priority is roomy family transport, long-distance cabin calm and a trunk that behaves like a proper utility, the Skoda Enyaq is the more natural fit; it rewards buyers who value tangible comfort and straightforward practicality. If you care most about minimising running costs, accessing a dense fast‑charging network and having the snappier, more tech-driven experience, the Tesla Model 3 will suit you better despite some compromises in rear-seat space and loading geometry. Both cars are competent daily drivers but they serve different instincts: Enyaq for reassurance and usable space, Model 3 for efficiency and software convenience. The technical comparison that follows will translate those character differences into the real‑world numbers that matter when you choose between them.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Tesla Model 3 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 31,700 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,143 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model 3 is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 750 km, about 161 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Model 3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers clearly more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers very slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is somewhat lighter – 1,772 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 302 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers very slightly more boot space – 594 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries markedly more – 526 kg compared to 377 kg. That’s a difference of about 149 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,700
Model 3

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 534 - 750 km
details
Skoda Enyaq
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 is a compact electric sedan that pairs brisk, responsive driving with a sleek, minimalist cabin and intuitive, software-led features. It makes a practical, modern choice for daily commutes and long-term ownership while emphasizing simplicity and advanced driver assistance.

details
0x0-Model3_06
0x0-Model3_RHD_03
0x0-Model3_12
0x0-Model3_09

Reviews Tesla Model 3

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
Trex
13 May 2026, 14:34:19

Excellent traction, relatively low energy consumption, driver-assist systems that are in a class of their own. On top of that, a very responsive steering system.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
dino999
18 Nov 2025, 08:47:05

I wanted to give 0 stars but you can't — unfortunately, it sucks.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Tesla Model 3
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
The Tesla Model 3 and Zeekr 7GT take very different approaches to modern EV ownership: the Model 3 is a compact, performance‑leaning sedan known for brisk acceleration, precise handling and Tesla’s ecosystem, while the Zeekr 7GT emphasizes a roomier, more comfort‑oriented experience with premium …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Ford Capri
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Comparing the Capri and the Enyaq is like putting a classic, driver-focused sports coupe head-to-head with a modern electric SUV designed for space, comfort and low running costs. If you’re after character and a sporty drive, the Capri delivers the feel; if you need range, practicality and everyday …
Skoda Enyaq
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
31,700 - 50,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
1,772 - 1,929 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
594 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
303 - 377 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Tesla
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.