In this exciting comparison, the iconic Ford Capri faces off against the modern and innovative Skoda Enyaq. While the Capri boasts classic styling and a heritage that resonates with car enthusiasts, the Enyaq offers cutting-edge electric technology and practicality for today's drivers. Each model has its unique appeal, making this showdown a fascinating exploration of automotive evolution.
The automotive landscape has transformed dramatically over the years, and while classic models like the Ford Capri have garnered a nostalgic fanbase, electric vehicles like the Skoda Enyaq represent the future of mobility. In this article, we’ll explore how these vehicles compare in terms of technical specifications, innovations, and overall appeal to drivers today.
Both the Ford Capri and the Skoda Enyaq present impressive specifications that cater to a range of driving preferences. The Capri, particularly in its SUV configuration, offers an electric powertrain with two distinct power outputs: 286 HP and 340 HP, utilizing either Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive systems. In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq has similar power offerings of 286 HP and 340 HP, featuring a robust electric setup that also focuses on efficiency.
Acceleration is a key factor for many drivers. The Ford Capri impressively reaches 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.3 seconds, while the Skoda Enyaq performs slightly less quickly, clocking in at 5.5 seconds. Despite this, both vehicles boast a top speed of 180 km/h, making them suitable for both city driving and highway cruising.
Range is arguably one of the most critical factors when evaluating electric vehicles. The Ford Capri shines with an electric range of up to 627 kilometers, significantly outpacing the Skoda Enyaq's maximum of 573 kilometers. However, both vehicles fall within the CO2 efficiency class A, showcasing their appeal to eco-conscious consumers.
Examining energy consumption reveals that the Capri’s figures range from 13.3 to 15.8 kWh/100km, whereas the Skoda Enyaq's consumption varies from 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100km. While the Capri holds a slight edge in efficiency, both vehicles aim to optimize energy usage for improved driving experiences.
When it comes to practicality, both models have been designed to accommodate passengers comfortably. Both the Ford Capri and the Skoda Enyaq offer seating for five and feature five doors for easy access. The Capri provides a trunk capacity of up to 572 liters, while the Enyaq slightly edges ahead with a capacity of 585 liters.
Dimensions reveal a small but notable difference: the Capri measures 4634 mm in length and 1872 mm in width, compared to the Enyaq’s measurement of 4649 mm in length and 1879 mm in width. The height difference remains marginal, making both vehicles spacious for everyday use.
Innovation is at the heart of both the Ford Capri and the Skoda Enyaq. The Capri incorporates cutting-edge technology such as advanced driver assistance systems and a contemporary infotainment setup designed to enhance user experience. With a focus on quality materials and modern aesthetics, the interior reflects the desire for a premium feel.
On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq showcases impressive innovations, including a state-of-the-art battery management system aimed at maintaining optimal battery health and efficiency. With a strong emphasis on connectivity and smart features, the Enyaq is tailored for tech-savvy millennials and beyond, ensuring that it meets modern connectivity demands.
In the battle of the Ford Capri versus the Skoda Enyaq, choosing between nostalgic charm and cutting-edge technology becomes a matter of personal preference. The Capri boasts exceptional range and historical allure, while the Enyaq emphasizes modern features and practicality.
Ultimately, whether you're drawn to the classic lines of the Ford Capri or the futuristic stance of the Skoda Enyaq, both vehicles showcase the evolution of automotive engineering in their unique ways. The decision reflects not just personal taste in style and performance, but also values regarding sustainability and innovation in the ever-changing landscape of the automotive world.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 38500 - 51100
£
|
Price
about 38100 - 54300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.3 - 15.8
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.4
kWh
|
Electric Range
560 - 627
km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587
km
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2098 - 2174
kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2258
kg
|
Trunk capacity
567 - 572
L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585
L
|
Length
4634
mm
|
Length
4649 - 4658
mm
|
Width
1872
mm
|
Width
1879
mm
|
Height
1626
mm
|
Height
1620 - 1623
mm
|
Payload
571 - 587
kg
|
Payload
492 - 528
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
170 - 340
HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 6.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.1
s
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
Torque
310 - 679
Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
125 - 250
kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.