Compare performance (340 HP vs 299 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 34,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or VW ID.4?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the electric vehicle market continues to expand, two names consistently rise to prominence: Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4. Both belonging to the Volkswagen Group, these electrified SUVs offer enticing blends of performance, efficiency, and innovation. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see how they stack up against each other.
In terms of design, the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 both embrace the sleek, modern aesthetics characteristic of electric vehicles. The Enyaq measures 4,658 mm in length, 1,879 mm in width, and up to 1,623 mm in height, creating a robust yet refined presence on the road. Meanwhile, the ID.4 holds a slightly more compact stance with a length of up to 4,584 mm, width of 1,852 mm, and height up to 1,634 mm.
Both offer spacious interiors with seating for five passengers, but the Enyaq takes a slight lead in cargo capacity, boasting up to 585 liters compared to the ID.4's 543 liters.
Under the hood, or rather, beneath the chassis, both models offer a choice between rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. The Enyaq comes equipped with power outputs ranging from 204 to 286 horsepower, while the ID.4 provides options from 170 to an impressive 340 horsepower, highlighting a more diverse range of performance capabilities.
The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h also shows competitive prowess. The Enyaq can achieve this in as little as 6.7 seconds, while the ID.4 is slightly more nimble with a range that can dip down to 5.4 seconds in its most powerful variant.
Battery capacity in these electric SUVs is pivotal in determining driving range and efficiency. The Enyaq offers two battery options at 59 kWh and 77 kWh. In contrast, the ID.4 offers a slightly smaller base battery at 52 kWh, alongside a 77 kWh option.
When it comes to electric range, the Enyaq excels with distances up to an impressive 587 km on a single charge. The ID.4 follows closely, delivering up to 572 km, making both vehicles suitable for long-distance travel without frequent charging.
Both the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 demonstrate impressive efficiency. The Enyaq's consumption starts as low as 14.8 kWh/100km, while the ID.4 begins at 15.8 kWh/100km. As expected with electric vehicles, both score an A in CO2 efficiency, delivering zero emissions during operation.
The Enyaq and ID.4 highlight the VW Group's commitment to sustainability and innovation. By utilizing eco-friendly materials and integrating state-of-the-art technology, they elevate the EV experience. Both models support over-the-air updates, ensuring that the software remains cutting-edge without requiring dealership visits.
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.4 largely depends on individual preferences and priorities. The Enyaq offers a slightly larger cargo space and impressive range efficiency, whereas the ID.4 provides a greater spectrum of power output and brisker acceleration in its top configurations. Regardless of choice, both models represent the future of sustainable and innovative automotive design.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW ID.4 is barely cheaper – starting at 34,800 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,066 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is only slightly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.4 kWh/100km for the VW ID.4. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers barely more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 19 km more than the VW ID.4.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 299 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the VW ID.4 takes 6.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers somewhat more torque with 679 Nm compared to 545 Nm. That’s about 134 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW ID.4 is very slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 9 kg.
When it comes to payload, the VW ID.4 carries barely more – 554 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
The VW ID.4 is a roomy, comfort‑focused electric SUV that makes family life and daily commuting effortless with a practical interior and a calm, efficient powertrain. It’s reassuring and sensible rather than thrilling — well suited to long stretches thanks to a relaxed ride and useful assistance systems, but the touch‑centric controls, restricted rear visibility and muted steering keep it from exciting drivers who want sportier dynamics.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
Price
34,800 - 47,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
Electric Range
425 - 570 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,219 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Payload
525 - 554 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 299 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 8.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 220 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España