VS

Alpine A290 vs Volvo S60 comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Volvo S60?

Alpine A290 vs Volvo S60: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • a bit lighter
details

Volvo S60

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Alpine A290 is markedly cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,343 £.

As for electric range, the Alpine A290 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 380 km, about 286 km more than the Volvo S60.

S60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers significantly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 237 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers substantially more torque with 709 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is a bit lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 1,715 kg. The difference is around 161 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo S60 offers noticeably more boot space – 427 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo S60 carries somewhat more – 475 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo S60 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,500
S60

Volvo S60

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 94 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Alfa Romeo Junior
Alpine A290
VS
In a thrilling showdown of compact charisma, the Alfa Romeo Junior takes on the Alpine A290 with poise and style. The Junior captivates with its timeless Italian design and sporty dynamics, appealing to those who cherish agile handling and lively road presence. In contrast, the Alpine A290 offers a …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Raval
VS
Alpine A290 and CUPRA Raval go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the CUPRA …
Alpine A290
Volvo S60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo S60

The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.

details
239391_New_Volvo_S60_R-Design_exterior
239392_New_Volvo_S60_R-Design_exterior
294031_S60_Recharge_Google_built-in
294032_S60_Recharge_T8_Thunder_Grey

Reviews Volvo S60

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Maynor
27 Apr 2026, 22:48:18

I choose the Volvo S60 for its elegance and because of the dealer that distributes it in my country. I find it superior in technology and efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo S60
Volvo XC40
VS
Volvo S60 and Volvo XC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Volvo S60 or the Volvo XC40 …
Alpine A290
Tesla Model 3
VS
Alpine A290 and Tesla Model 3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the Tesla …
Alpine A290
VW ID.Polo
VS
Alpine A290 and VW ID.Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the VW …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Alpine A290
Toyota Yaris
VS
Alpine A290 and Toyota Yaris go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the Toyota …
Alpine A290
Alpine A390
VS
Alpine A290 and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the Alpine …
Volvo S60
Volvo V60
VS
In the battle between the Volvo S60 and the Volvo V60, each model showcases the brand's commitment to safety and performance, though they cater to different preferences. The S60, with its sleek sedan design, offers a sporty driving experience, while the V60’s versatile wagon shape provides ample …
Alpine A290
Volvo S60

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
94 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
16 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
60 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
Length
-
Length
4,778 mm
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
1,431 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
461 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Volvo
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.