VS

Audi A3 Sportback vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (400 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Ford Ranger?

Audi A3 Sportback vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Audi A3 Sportback

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

Ford Ranger

details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A3 Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi A3 Sportback is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,439 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers significantly more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 99 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers visibly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 119 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 197 Nm more.

A3 Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is clearly lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,045 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 509 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A3 Sportback is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
A3 Sportback

Audi A3 Sportback

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 400 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 134 - 141 km
Audi A3 Sportback
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
Audi A3 Sportback
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
25 - 211 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
410 - 480 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.