@ Audi AG

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Audi A3 Sportback vs Mazda CX-30 – Differences & prices compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Audi A3 Sportback?

The Audi A3 Sportback reaches a peak output of 400 HP, depending on the model.

Q: How much fuel does the Audi A3 Sportback use?

On average, the Audi A3 Sportback consumes 1.10 L.

Q: What is the Audi A3 Sportback’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 141 km.

Q: How many kWh does the Audi A3 Sportback’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 19.70 kWh.

Q: What maximum speed does the Audi A3 Sportback reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 250 km/h.

Q: How big is the Audi A3 Sportback overall?

Overall, the Audi A3 Sportback is 4353 mm long, 1816 mm wide and 1470 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Audi A3 Sportback or Mazda CX-30 fits your lifestyle better.

scroll down

A3 Sportback @ Audi AG

A Battle of Compact Versatility: Audi A3 Sportback vs. Mazda CX-30

When it comes to the competitive hatchback and crossover segment, the Audi A3 Sportback and Mazda CX-30 stand out as exceptional options. Both cater to diverse needs, combining style with practicality, yet they embody distinct characteristics influenced by their manufacturer’s philosophies. This article delves into the technical specifications and innovations of each model, providing a comprehensive comparison for prospective buyers.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Design and Body Type

The Audi A3 Sportback presents itself as a sleek and sporty hatchback, designed for drivers who value agility and aesthetics. With a length of 4,353 mm and a width of 1,816 mm, it offers a compact form that is easily maneuverable in urban environments. The trunk capacity stands at a respectable 380 liters, providing adequate space for luggage or shopping.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 adopts the SUV body type, delivering a more pronounced road presence. Measuring 4,395 mm in length and 1,795 mm in width, this model combines higher seating without compromising driving dynamics. The CX-30 boasts a larger trunk capacity of 430 liters, making it better suited for families or those who require more cargo space.

scroll down

A3 Sportback @ Audi AG

Engine Options and Performance

The Audi A3 Sportback offers a variety of engine options, including petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrids, with power outputs ranging from 116 to an exhilarating 400 HP. Its performance is bolstered by advanced technologies such as mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) systems. The A3 Sportback can achieve impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration times as low as 3.8 seconds, depending on the variant chosen.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 is powered by a petrol MHEV engine, delivering up to 186 HP. Although it doesn’t match the sheer power range of the A3, its performance is competitive within its segment. Acceleration times peak at around 8.3 seconds, making it a responsive choice for everyday driving.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

In the realm of fuel efficiency, the Audi A3 Sportback impresses with consumption figures as low as 4.8 L/100 km across its various engine options. It also benefits from a lower CO2 output, rated as low as 120 g/km for some versions, appealing to environmentally conscious buyers.

The Mazda CX-30, though slightly less efficient, still offers competitive performance. Its fuel consumption varies from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions ranging from 129 to 148 g/km, positioning it as a respectable option in terms of running costs.

A3 Sportback @ Audi AG

Technology and Innovations

Both the Audi A3 Sportback and Mazda CX-30 come equipped with cutting-edge technology that enhances the driving experience. Audi's MMI infotainment system stands out with its user-friendly interface and an optional Virtual Cockpit that puts critical information right in front of the driver. Advanced driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control and lane departure warning, further enhance safety.

The Mazda CX-30 features Mazda's latest infotainment system, which, while intuitive, relies on a dial control that some may find less accessible while driving. It also includes a suite of safety technologies, such as blind-spot monitoring and smart braking assistance, ensuring peace of mind during daily commutes.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Audi A3 Sportback and Mazda CX-30 ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. The A3 Sportback is the choice for those seeking performance-oriented driving and a premium feel wrapped in a compact package. Meanwhile, the CX-30 offers practicality, style, and a higher driving position, appealing to those who prioritize versatility and cargo space.

Both vehicles highlight the respective brands' commitment to innovation and excellence, ensuring that whichever model you choose, you’ll enjoy a remarkable driving experience.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A3 Sportback @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Audi A3 Sportback costs 26800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1594 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi A3 Sportback manages with 1.10 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.60 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback has a significantly edge – offering 400 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 214 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 4.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi A3 Sportback performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A3 Sportback pulls convincingly stronger with 500 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm difference.

scroll down

A3 Sportback @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is slight lighter – 1360 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more room – 430 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs to a small extent better – up to 1406 L, which is about 206 L more than the Audi A3 Sportback.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 hardly perceptible takes the win – 496 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi A3 Sportback shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £26,800

@ Audi AG