VS

Audi A3 Sportback vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (400 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Mazda CX-80?

Audi A3 Sportback vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Audi A3 Sportback

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A3 Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi A3 Sportback is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,328 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers considerably more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 81 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers a bit more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers only slightly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

A3 Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is substantially lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 771 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi A3 Sportback offers clearly more boot space – 380 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 170 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A3 Sportback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
A3 Sportback

Audi A3 Sportback

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 400 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 134 - 141 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi A3 Sportback
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the VW T‑Roc share many Volkswagen Group underpinnings but target different buyers: the A3 Sportback focuses on refined driving dynamics and premium cabin quality, while the VW T‑Roc offers a taller, more practical crossover package at a more value-driven price. This …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Audi A3 Sportback
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details
A202267_overfull
A202258_overfull
A202235_overfull
A202271_overfull
A201906_overfull
A202227_overfull

Reviews Audi A3 Sportback

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi A3 Limousine
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Audi A3 Sportback and Audi A3 Limousine, both models showcase the brand's commitment to luxury and performance, yet cater to slightly different preferences. The Sportback impresses with its versatile hatchback design, offering enhanced cargo space and …
Audi A3 Sportback
CUPRA Formentor
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and CUPRA Formentor are two popular choices in the compact premium segment, with the A3 emphasising refined, practical hatchback packaging and the Formentor leaning into sporty styling and sharper driving dynamics. This comparison will weigh their space, performance, …
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi Q2
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and Audi Q2 represent two distinct approaches to compact premium motoring: the A3 Sportback is a refined, practical hatchback with a focus on space and driving composure, while the Q2 is a compact crossover that trades some boot space for higher ride height, a more upright …
Audi A3 Sportback
CUPRA Leon
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and CUPRA Leon are two compact premium hatchbacks that blend everyday practicality with strong performance and upscale interiors. Choose the A3 for a measured, refined ride and classy cabin, or the CUPRA Leon if you want sharper handling, bolder styling and performance-focused …
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi A4 Avant
VS
In the battle of versatility and performance, the Audi A3 Sportback and Audi A4 Avant both offer distinct advantages for drivers seeking luxury and practicality. The A3 Sportback impresses with its compact design and agile handling, making it an ideal choice for urban environments, while the A4 …
Audi A3 Sportback
Skoda Scala
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the Skoda Scala are both excellent options for those seeking a compact yet versatile ride, each showcasing their respective brand’s strengths. The A3 Sportback offers a more premium experience with refined interiors and advanced technology, but comes with a higher price …
Audi A3 Sportback
CUPRA Born
VS
Unsure whether the Audi A3 Sportback or the CUPRA Born is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi A3 Sportback
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
25 - 211 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
410 - 480 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Audi A3 Sportback?

The Audi A3 Sportback is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.