VS

Audi A3 Sportback vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (400 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Nissan Interstar?

Audi A3 Sportback vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Audi A3 Sportback

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly lighter
details

Nissan Interstar

  • significantly more electric range
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A3 Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi A3 Sportback is noticeably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,159 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 6.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers significantly more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 269 km more than the Audi A3 Sportback.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers clearly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 230 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers noticeably more torque with 500 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

A3 Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Audi A3 Sportback offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is significantly lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 708 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 962 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A3 Sportback is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
A3 Sportback

Audi A3 Sportback

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 400 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 134 - 141 km
Audi A3 Sportback
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
Audi A3 Sportback
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
25 - 211 g/km
co2
0 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,685 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
410 - 485 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.