VS

Audi A6 Avant vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (367 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 Avant or Mazda CX-80?

Audi A6 Avant vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Audi A6 Avant

  • moderately more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 Avant

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is marginally cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Audi A6 Avant costs 49,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 386 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A6 Avant uses 2.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi A6 Avant offers clearly more range – reaching up to 101 km, about 41 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 Avant offers moderately more power – delivering 367 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 Avant is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.7 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 Avant delivers marginally more torque with 580 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

A6 Avant

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A6 Avant is somewhat lighter – 1,865 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 266 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi A6 Avant offers significantly more boot space – 503 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 245 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A6 Avant is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,700
A6 Avant

Audi A6 Avant

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 367 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.3 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range 94 - 101 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi A5 Avant
Audi A6 Avant
VS
The Audi A5 Avant is the stylish, nimble estate that turns everyday runs into a bit of a pleasure drive, whereas the Audi A6 Avant trades some of that sporting charm for a roomier cabin, extra tech and a composed motorway demeanour. Choose the A5 if you crave sharper looks and livelier handling, …
Audi A4 Avant
Audi A6 Avant
VS
Choosing between the Audi A4 Avant and Audi A6 Avant is about weighing compact agility and lower running costs against larger space, refinement and long-distance comfort. The A4 Avant suits buyers after a sporty, city-friendly estate with crisp handling and efficiency; the A6 Avant is for those who …
Audi A6 Avant
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A6 Avant

The Audi A6 Avant wraps executive poise and usable practicality into an impeccably finished estate that makes everyday driving feel noticeably more grown-up. It serves up a calm, composed ride and clever packaging for buyers who want space and refinement without ostentation — the sensible choice that still manages to impress.

details
A1810703_overfull
A1810705_overfull
A1810707_overfull
A1810691_overfull
A1810698_overfull
A1810696_overfull

Reviews Audi A6 Avant

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Audi A6 Avant
BMW 3 Series Touring
VS
The Audi A6 Avant and BMW 3 Series Touring are premium station wagons that blend everyday practicality with upscale comfort and performance. The A6 Avant leans toward roomy refinement and high-tech luxury, while the 3 Series Touring prioritizes sportier dynamics and driver engagement.
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Audi A6 Avant
Mercedes GLC
VS
In the realm of luxury vehicles, the Audi A6 Avant and the Mercedes GLC exemplify refined engineering and elegance. The Audi A6 Avant distinguishes itself with a sleek exterior and spacious interiors, providing an exceptional blend of comfort and innovation. Meanwhile, the Mercedes GLC offers a …
Audi A6 Avant
Audi Q5
VS
Choosing between the Audi A6 Avant and the Audi Q5 comes down to whether you prefer the long‑distance comfort and load‑carrying practicality of a classic estate or the higher driving position and everyday versatility of a compact SUV. The A6 Avant shines as a refined, spacious touring car with a …
Audi A6 Avant
Volvo V60
VS
In the battle of practicality and luxury, the Audi A6 Avant stands out with its sleek design and advanced technology, offering a sporty driving experience alongside ample cargo space. Meanwhile, the Volvo V60 impresses with its commitment to safety and Scandinavian style, providing a comfortable …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Audi A6 Avant
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,700 - 70,200 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
94 - 101 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
53 - 170 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,865 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
404 - 503 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
535 - 570 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 8.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 - 580 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
Is the Audi A6 Avant offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi A6 Avant is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.