VS

Audi A6 Avant vs Skoda Fabia – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Audi A6 Avant or Skoda Fabia fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 Avant @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Fabia has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £, while the Audi A6 Avant costs 49700 £. That’s a price difference of around 32837 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi A6 Avant manages with 2.30 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.90 L. The difference is about 2.60 L per 100 km.

Fabia @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 Avant has a decisively edge – offering 367 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 217 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 Avant is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.70 s, while the Skoda Fabia takes 8 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi A6 Avant performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Fabia tops out at 222 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A6 Avant pulls decisively stronger with 550 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm difference.

A6 Avant @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Fabia is clearly lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1865 kg. The difference is around 722 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi A6 Avant offers noticeable more room – 503 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi A6 Avant performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1534 L, which is about 344 L more than the Skoda Fabia.

When it comes to payload, Audi A6 Avant evident takes the win – 570 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi A6 Avant shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £49,700
A1810703_overfull

Audi A6 Avant

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 367 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.3 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 94 - 101 km
details

Audi A6 Avant

The Audi A6 Avant effortlessly combines elegance with practicality, making it an ideal choice for those seeking both style and versatility in a luxury estate. Its spacious interior offers a refined atmosphere, where high-quality materials and advanced technology come together to enhance the driving experience. With its dynamic performance and agile handling, the A6 Avant delivers a compelling blend of comfort and sportiness, making every journey a pleasure.

details
A1810703_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1810705_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1810707_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1810691_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1810698_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1810696_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia presents itself as a practical and stylish hatchback, perfect for urban driving and beyond. Its interior is designed with comfort and functionality in mind, offering ample space and intuitive controls. With a focus on efficiency, the Fabia provides a smooth driving experience, complemented by its crisp and modern exterior design.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Similar Comparisons

Audi A5 Avant
Audi A6 Avant
VS
The Audi A5 Avant is the stylish, nimble estate that turns everyday runs into a bit of a pleasure drive, whereas the Audi A6 Avant trades some of that sporting charm for a roomier cabin, extra tech and a composed motorway demeanour. Choose the A5 if you crave sharper looks and livelier handling, but pick the A6 when genuine loadspace, rear-seat comfort and a touch more executive gravitas matter — even if it asks for a slightly bulkier wallet.
SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the SEAT Ibiza showcases its sporty design and agile handling, making it a favorite for urban drivers seeking a bit of flair during their daily commute. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia impresses with its practicality and generous interior space, offering a more family-friendly alternative without compromising on performance. Both vehicles share Volkswagen Group DNA, ensuring reliable engineering and a range of efficient engine options, but choosing between them ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities.
Audi A6 Avant
Skoda Fabia
A6 Avant
Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
49700 - 70200 £
Price
16900 - 26000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 7.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
94 - 101 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
20.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
53 - 170 g/km
co2
112 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1865 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
1143 - 1261 kg
Trunk capacity
404 - 503 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
4999 mm
Length
4108 - 4125 mm
Width
1875 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1472 mm
Height
1459 - 1461 mm
Max trunk capacity
1423 - 1534 L
Max trunk capacity
1190 L
Payload
535 - 570 kg
Payload
414 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
Power HP
80 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 8.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
238 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 222 km/h
Torque
340 - 550 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
Power kW
59 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1968 - 2995 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Audi
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the Skoda Kamiq, both models showcase Skoda's commitment to practicality and style. While the Fabia excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the Kamiq offers a more rugged stature and higher ride height, perfect for those seeking versatility in both city and country driving. Ultimately, the choice between these two Skoda vehicles boils down to personal preference, with each catering to distinct needs and lifestyles.
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Scala, buyers are treated to two distinct flavors of practicality and style. The Fabia excels as a compact hatchback with a nimble design and generous cargo space, making it ideal for city driving. Meanwhile, the Scala stands out with its more spacious interior and striking aesthetics, appealing to those who prioritize both roominess and modern flair in their daily commute.
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia stands out with its practicality and generous interior space, making it an attractive choice for drivers who demand reliability and functionality.
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sportier design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to buyers looking for a fun-to-drive option. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and impressive boot capacity, making it ideal for families and daily commuters. Ultimately, the choice between the Arona and Fabia will hinge on personal priorities, whether they lie in style and performance or practicality and functionality.
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
In the compact car showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the VW Golf, both models offer impressive build quality typical of the Volkswagen Group. The Skoda Fabia shines with its exceptional value for money, providing ample space and practicality for urban driving. Meanwhile, the VW Golf maintains its iconic status with superior driving dynamics, a refined interior, and a range of advanced tech features, appealing to those who crave a more premium experience.
Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the compact hatchback segment, the Hyundai i20 and Skoda Fabia offer distinct advantages for discerning buyers. The i20 impresses with its stylish design, advanced tech features, and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for urban commuters. Meanwhile, the Fabia excels with its refined driving dynamics and practicality, appealing to those who prioritize a robust build and storage versatility.
Audi A6 Avant
Audi Q5
VS
The Audi A6 Avant and Audi Q5 present two distinct approaches to luxury and practicality, catering to different driver preferences. While the A6 Avant boasts a more elegant design and a focus on performance with its powerful engine options, the Q5 offers a higher driving position and versatile cargo space, making it ideal for active lifestyles. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to whether one prioritizes sporty sophistication or versatile functionality.
Audi A6 Avant
VW Passat
VS
In the battle of luxurious wagons, the Audi A6 Avant outshines with its distinguished design and high-tech interior, making it the go-to choice for those seeking elegance and performance. Meanwhile, the VW Passat offers a more budget-friendly alternative, delivering practicality and ample space without sacrificing comfort or quality. Both models cater to different desires, with the A6 Avant appealing to those with a taste for premium craftsmanship and the Passat offering dependable and spacious versatility.
Is the Audi A6 Avant offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi A6 Avant is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.