VS

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (551 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (53,800 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Sportback or Mazda CX-60?

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 e-tron Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-60 is markedly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback costs 53,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,157 £.

As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers clearly more range – reaching up to 754 km, about 691 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 224 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback delivers noticeably more torque with 855 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

A6 e-tron Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is a bit lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 285 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 502 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries a bit more – 612 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,800
A6 e-tron Sportback

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 326 - 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 572 - 754 km
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback wraps futuristic electric technology in elegant, coupe-like proportions, so you arrive looking sharp without shouting for attention. Inside, refined materials and a calm, driver-focused layout make it a convincing choice for buyers who want quiet, effortless performance with a dash of everyday practicality — the kind of car that raises eyebrows without saying a word.

details

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

Price
53,800 - 98,700 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
572 - 754 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,400 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
502 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4,928 mm
Length
-
Width
1,923 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,465 - 1,487 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,330 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 500 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.