Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi e-tron GT vs Ford Mustang Mach-E - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (843 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (93300 £ vs 48400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
e-tron GT
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Mustang Mach-E has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48400 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 44914 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Mustang Mach-E: with 17.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Audi e-tron GT with 17.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Audi e-tron GT performs slight better – achieving up to 617 km, about 17 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT has a clearly edge – offering 843 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 356 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 2.90 s, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 3.80 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi e-tron GT pulls barely noticeable stronger with 1027 Nm compared to 950 Nm. That’s about 77 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
e-tron GT
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Mustang Mach-E offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is hardly perceptible lighter – 2161 kg compared to 2355 kg. The difference is around 194 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers distinct more room – 519 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 114 L.
When it comes to payload, Audi e-tron GT minimal takes the win – 485 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E proves to be barely ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Mustang Mach-E is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Audi e-tron GT
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi e-tron GT
The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
3 (2 Reviews)
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Audi e-tron GT
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
93300 - 137600 £
|
Price
48400 - 66900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
97 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2355 - 2395 kg
|
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
4997 - 5004 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1964 mm
|
Width
1881 mm
|
|
Height
1379 - 1394 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 485 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
245 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
625 - 1027 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
Is the Audi e-tron GT offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.