@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Polestar 4 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Mustang Mach-E or Polestar 4?

Mustang Mach-E @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford vs Polestar: A Detailed Comparison of Electric SUVs

As electric vehicles (EVs) gain traction in the automotive market, two contenders have captured attention: Ford and Polestar. Both brands, rooted in rich automotive traditions, have ventured into the electric SUV segment, bringing forth innovative technologies and compelling designs. In this article, we will delve into a head-to-head comparison of Ford's electric offerings against those from Polestar, exploring their technical specifications, innovations, and features.

4 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Power and Performance

When it comes to power, both manufacturers have done well to equip their SUVs with robust electric drivetrains. Ford's electric SUV lineup boasts up to 487 horsepower and torque figures ranging up to 880 Nm. This enables exhilarating acceleration, with some models achieving the 0-100 km/h sprint in just 3.5 seconds.

On the other hand, Polestar’s latest offerings are no slouch either, with a maximum output of 544 horsepower and peak torque of 686 Nm. These figures translate to impressive performance, with the 0-100 km/h acceleration time estimated at just 3.8 seconds. The focus on performance ensures that both brands deliver thrilling driving experiences typical of their combustion-engine predecessors.

Mustang Mach-E @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Electric Range and Efficiency

Electric range is crucial for any EV buyer, and both Ford and Polestar excel in this area. Ford's electric models can achieve ranges of up to 600 km on a single charge, while Polestar offers an impressive 620 km range. Efficiency also plays a vital role; Ford’s SUV consumption varies from 17.3 to 21.3 kWh/100 km, while Polestar registers a slightly higher consumption at 18.7 kWh/100 km.

4 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Battery and Charging

Battery capacity is another important aspect of electric vehicles. Ford's range encompasses battery sizes from 72.6 kWh to 91 kWh, while Polestar's offerings come with a 94 kWh capacity. Both manufacturers have designed their vehicles for fast charging, allowing for minimal downtime that aligns with the increasing trend of electric mobility.

Mustang Mach-E @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Interior Comfort and Technology

Inside the cabin, both Ford and Polestar place significant emphasis on driver comfort and high-tech features. Ford's electric SUVs often come equipped with a sophisticated infotainment system, intuitive controls, and ample storage space, with trunk capacities around 402 liters. In contrast, Polestar’s sophisticated Scandinavian design philosophy focuses on minimalism and user experience, offering a more premium feel, especially in its higher-end models where trunk capacity can reach 526 liters.

4 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Innovative Features

Both brands integrate advanced technologies into their vehicle offerings. Ford has embraced features like connected car technology, which allows for over-the-air updates, enhanced safety systems, and driver-assistance tools. On the other hand, Polestar emphasizes sustainable materials throughout its vehicles, alongside cutting-edge safety features and driver-centric technology that enhances the overall driving experience.

Mustang Mach-E @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion: Which SUV Comes Out on Top?

Ultimately, the choice between Ford and Polestar comes down to individual preferences. Ford provides a robust performance and extensive electric range, making it appealing for those who prioritize power and versatility. Meanwhile, Polestar offers a more upscale experience combined with a focus on sustainability and style.

As both brands continue to evolve in the electric vehicle landscape, the competition is likely to drive innovation and quality higher, benefitting electric vehicle enthusiasts around the globe.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Mustang Mach-E has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48400 £, while the Polestar 4 costs 53100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4629 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Mustang Mach-E: with 17.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Polestar 4 with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.

As for range, the Polestar 4 performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 620 km, about 20 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 has a to a small extent edge – offering 544 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 3.80 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 200 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 950 Nm compared to 686 Nm. That’s about 264 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is minimal lighter – 2161 kg compared to 2230 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Polestar 4 offers barely noticeable more room – 526 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 7 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Polestar 4 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1536 L, which is about 116 L more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

When it comes to payload, Polestar 4 hardly perceptible takes the win – 455 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Ford Mustang Mach-E shows itself to be has a very small edge and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £48,400
Mustang Mach-E @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Mustang Mach-E marks a new chapter in the legacy of the iconic American brand, combining classic muscle car aesthetics with modern electric vehicle technology. Its sleek design captures the spirit of innovation while offering a spacious and tech-savvy interior for enhanced driving comfort. The Mach-E promises an exhilarating driving experience, packed with cutting-edge features that set a new standard for electric SUVs.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

details
7458E184-FE1C-49CD-8688-8D9AD87DD167 @ Polestar Automotive Holding
3ACA6B65-1C98-412F-9D32-588E078B6285 @ Polestar Automotive Holding
3634B075-6672-406F-B1C3-46F68F4A8DD7 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model Y
VS
The Polestar 4 throws a Scandinavian, coupe‑like silhouette and taut handling at you, feeling like the design‑obsessed, premium choice with crisp interior finishes and a surprisingly engaging drive. The Tesla Model Y, meanwhile, plays the utility card — roomier, cheaper to run on long trips thanks …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Polestar 4
Mustang Mach-E @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
4 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Costs and Consumption
Price
48400 - 66900 £
Price
53100 - 59900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.7 kWh
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
73 - 91 kWh
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
Curb weight
2230 - 2355 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
526 L
Length
4713 - 4743 mm
Length
4840 mm
Width
1881 mm
Width
2008 mm
Height
1613 - 1624 mm
Height
1534 mm
Max trunk capacity
1345 - 1420 L
Max trunk capacity
1536 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Polestar

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Capri
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly …
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Sealion 7
VS
In the burgeoning electric vehicle market, the Polestar 4 and BYD Sealion 7 stand out as compelling options for eco-conscious drivers. The Polestar 4 impresses with its sleek design and advanced tech features, while the BYD Sealion 7 offers practicality and a robust battery range. Both models cater …
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
ZEEKR 7X
VS
In the compact coupe‑SUV duel, the Polestar 4 brings Scandinavian minimalism, focused handling and a premium EV feel, while the ZEEKR 7X punches back with full‑size practicality, wall‑to‑wall screens and impressive range-for-the-money. Choose the Polestar 4 if you want a sporty, design-led electric …
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 3
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
VS
In the latest showdown between the Polestar 3 and Polestar 4, both models showcase the brand's commitment to sleek design and sustainable performance. The Polestar 3, with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, offers a commanding presence perfect for families or those needing extra …
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 2
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
VS
The Polestar 2 and Polestar 4 represent the Swedish brand's commitment to performance and sustainability, but they cater to different driving preferences. While the Polestar 2 offers a sporty hatchback experience with agile handling and a spacious interior, the Polestar 4 leans towards a more …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW i4
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
VS
In the battle of electric performance sedans, the BMW i4 emerges as a sporty contender with its impressive blend of dynamic handling and long-range capability, appealing to enthusiasts seeking an engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Polestar 4 offers a compelling package with its sleek …
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.7 Touring
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
VS
In the competitive realm of electric vehicles, the VW ID.7 Touring stands out with its spacious interior and cutting-edge technology, making it a perfect choice for families seeking comfort on long journeys. Meanwhile, the Polestar 4 captivates with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, …
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
Volvo ES90
VS
Unsure whether the Polestar 4 or the Volvo ES90 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.