Compare performance (300 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Ford Transit Transporter?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi Q2 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 42,452 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers moderately more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 31 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers only slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Audi Q2 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
127 - 183 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 510 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|