VS

Audi Q2 vs Land Rover Range Rover – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Two cars, one duel: Audi Q2 meets Land Rover Range Rover.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q2 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24900 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £. That’s a price difference of around 97885 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover manages with 2.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Audi Q2 with 4.80 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.

Range Rover @ media.landrover.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover has a clearly edge – offering 615 HP compared to 300 HP. That’s roughly 315 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Audi Q2 takes 4.90 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover performs minimal better – reaching 261 km/h, while the Audi Q2 tops out at 250 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover pulls significantly stronger with 800 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm difference.

Q2 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Audi Q2 is significantly lighter – 1330 kg compared to 2504 kg. The difference is around 1174 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers significantly more room – 818 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 413 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover performs convincingly better – up to 2176 L, which is about 1126 L more than the Audi Q2.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover clearly perceptible takes the win – 846 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 336 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Land Rover Range Rover proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £122,700
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_8864

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 300 - 615 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.7 - 11.7 L
  • Electric Range : 116 - 117 km
details

Audi Q2

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q2 captures attention with its bold and distinctive design, combining compact dimensions with a sporty silhouette. Inside, the cabin boasts high-quality materials and a modern infotainment system, ensuring a comfortable driving experience. With its agile handling and efficient performance, the Q2 is a perfect urban companion for those seeking both style and functionality.

details
A207341_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207339_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207364_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207355_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207349_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207346_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Land Rover Range Rover

The Land Rover Range Rover epitomises luxury and capability in the realms of off-road vehicles. Its elegant design seamlessly marries sophistication with ruggedness, making it equally suitable for urban environments and challenging terrains. Inside, passengers are treated to a plush interior with premium materials and cutting-edge technology that ensure a comfortable and connected driving experience.

details
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_8864 @ media.landrover.com
Range_Rover_Batumi_Gold_D350_First_Edition_7354 @ media.landrover.com
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_7927 @ media.landrover.com
Range_Rover_Interiors_8452 @ media.landrover.com

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities, catering to varying consumer preferences. The Q2 boasts a more premium feel with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the T-Cross provides practicality with its spacious cabin and impressive cargo capacity. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on whether buyers prioritize luxury or versatility in their everyday driving experiences.
Audi Q2
VW Golf
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Audi Q2 stands out with its premium build quality and sharp handling, offering a luxury feel in a small package. Meanwhile, the Volkswagen Golf, beloved by many for its practicality and storied heritage, delivers a balanced ride with ample space and cutting-edge technology. While the Q2 appeals with its upscale design, the Golf wins with versatility and a slightly more budget-friendly approach.
Audi Q2
Land Rover Range Rover
Q2
Range Rover

Costs and Consumption
Price
24900 - 43600 £
Price
122700 - 244700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
co2
127 - 183 g/km
co2
62 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1330 - 1610 kg
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Length
4208 - 4216 mm
Length
5052 - 5258 mm
Width
1794 - 1802 mm
Width
2047 mm
Height
1495 - 1508 mm
Height
1870 mm
Max trunk capacity
1000 - 1050 L
Max trunk capacity
1841 - 2176 L
Payload
450 - 510 kg
Payload
589 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
197 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
218 - 261 km/h
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
Brand
Audi
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q2
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and Volvo XC40 stand out with their distinctive designs and premium features. The Q2 impresses with its sportier handling and sleek aesthetics, while the XC40 offers a spacious, practical interior along with advanced safety technologies. Ultimately, choosing between these two models hinges on personal preferences for performance versus practicality, making both vehicles compelling options for discerning buyers.
Audi Q2
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style, technology, and performance. While the Q2 offers a more premium feel with its luxurious interior and refined driving dynamics, the T-Roc appeals with its practicality and slightly sportier design. Ultimately, both models deliver impressive versatility and are well-equipped to cater to the diverse needs of modern drivers.
Audi Q2
Mercedes B Class
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Audi Q2 stands out with its bold design and sporty handling, appealing to those seeking a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Mercedes B-Klasse emphasizes practicality and comfort, offering a spacious interior and advanced technology features that cater to families and daily commuters alike. Ultimately, the choice between these two premium models comes down to personal preference, whether one prioritizes agility or versatility.
Audi Q2
VW Taigo
VS
In the competitive crossover market, the Audi Q2 and VW Taigo stand out with their distinct design philosophies and technological offerings. The Q2 impresses with its premium feel and advanced features, making it a favorite among luxury compact SUV enthusiasts, while the Taigo delivers practicality and modern styling at a more accessible price point. Ultimately, the choice between these two models boils down to personal preference for brand prestige versus value-driven functionality.
Volvo XC90
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi Q2
VS
In the latest face-off between the Audi A3 Sportback and the Audi Q2, enthusiasts will find two distinct approaches to premium compact motoring. The A3 Sportback impresses with its sleek design and dynamic driving experience, while the Q2 offers a more adventurous, SUV-inspired stance that caters to those seeking versatility. Ultimately, choosing between these two Audi models comes down to personal preference—sporty hatchback vibes or rugged crossover appeal.
Audi Q2
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
Audi Q2
Renault Captur
VS
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.