What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Audi Q2?

Depending on the version, the Audi Q2 delivers up to 300 HP.

How much fuel does the Audi Q2 use?

On average, the Audi Q2 consumes 4.80 L.

What drive types are available for the Land Rover Range Rover?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Land Rover Range Rover's engine?

Up to 615 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Land Rover Range Rover according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 2.70 L.

How far can the Land Rover Range Rover go on a full charge?

According to WLTP, the Land Rover Range Rover can travel up to 117 km on a single charge.

How many kWh does the Land Rover Range Rover’s battery hold?

The battery capacity is 31.80 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Land Rover Range Rover?

The Land Rover Range Rover reaches up to 261 km/h.

What are the Land Rover Range Rover’s length, width and height?

Length 5052 mm, width 2047 mm, height 1870 mm – those are the dimensions of the Land Rover Range Rover.

Audi Q2 vs Land Rover Range Rover - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q2 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24900 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 97885 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover manages with 2.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Audi Q2 with 4.80 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.

Range Rover

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover has a clearly edge – offering 615 HP compared to 300 HP. That’s roughly 315 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Audi Q2 takes 4.90 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover pulls significantly stronger with 800 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm difference.

Q2

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Audi Q2 is significantly lighter – 1330 kg compared to 2504 kg. The difference is around 1174 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers significantly more room – 818 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 413 L.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover clearly perceptible takes the win – 846 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 336 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Land Rover Range Rover proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Audi Q2

4.7 (3 Reviews)

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover

Top Car Comparisons

Audi Q2

VW Golf

VS

The Audi Q2 trades the Golf’s down-to-earth practicality for a dash of city-cool style and a slightly raised driving position, so you’ll arrive looking sharper — but with a bit less rear-seat space and often a higher price. For buyers who value sensible packaging, ride comfort and everyday …

Audi Q2

VW T-Roc

VS

In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style, technology, and performance. While the Q2 offers a more premium feel with its luxurious interior and refined driving dynamics, the T-Roc appeals with its practicality and slightly …

Costs and Consumption
Price 24900 - 43600 £	Price 122700 - 244700 £
Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 8.1 L	Consumption L/100km 2.7 - 11.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 116 - 117 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 31.80 kWh
co2 127 - 183 g/km	co2 62 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 71 - 90 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Off-Roader
Seats 5	Seats 5 - 7
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 1330 - 1610 kg	Curb weight 2504 - 2810 kg
Trunk capacity 355 - 405 L	Trunk capacity 212 - 818 L
Length -	Length 5052 - 5258 mm
Width 1794 - 1802 mm	Width 2047 mm
Height -	Height 1870 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1841 - 2176 L
Payload 450 - 510 kg	Payload 589 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Diesel	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 116 - 300 HP	Power HP 300 - 615 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.9 - 10.5 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.5 - 6.6 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 218 - 261 km/h
Torque 200 - 400 Nm	Torque 650 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 6 - 8
Power kW 85 - 221 kW	Power kW 221 - 452 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 2997 - 4395 cm3