VS

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-5 – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi Q2 or Mazda CX-5?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q2 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24900 £, while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 5143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q2 manages with 4.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 2.20 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 has a convincingly edge – offering 300 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 5.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q2 performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 55 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q2 pulls decisively stronger with 400 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 162 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q2 is evident lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 299 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers distinct more room – 583 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 178 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs clearly better – up to 2019 L, which is about 969 L more than the Audi Q2.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q2 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q2 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,900
A207341_overfull

Audi Q2

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 8.1 L
details

Audi Q2

The Audi Q2 captures attention with its bold and distinctive design, combining compact dimensions with a sporty silhouette. Inside, the cabin boasts high-quality materials and a modern infotainment system, ensuring a comfortable driving experience. With its agile handling and efficient performance, the Q2 is a perfect urban companion for those seeking both style and functionality.

details
A207341_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207339_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207364_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207355_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207349_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A207346_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Mazda CX-5

3 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-5 exemplifies the perfect blend of style and practicality, offering a sleek design that turns heads while providing ample space for passengers and luggage. Its refined interior boasts high-quality materials and a user-friendly interface, making every journey a comfortable experience. With its engaging driving dynamics, the CX-5 delivers both performance and efficiency, appealing to drivers who crave excitement and reliability.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1) @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1 @ de.mazda-press.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Skoda Karoq enter a competitive arena with their compelling blend of style, practicality, and performance. The CX-5 captivates with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, while the Karoq impresses with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on whether you prioritize sporty handling or versatile functionality.
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities, catering to varying consumer preferences. The Q2 boasts a more premium feel with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the T-Cross provides practicality with its spacious cabin and impressive cargo capacity. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on whether buyers prioritize luxury or versatility in their everyday driving experiences.
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-5
Q2
CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
24900 - 43600 £
Price
30000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L
Consumption L/100km
7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 183 g/km
co2
157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
56 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1330 - 1610 kg
Curb weight
1629 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
583 L
Length
4208 - 4216 mm
Length
4690 mm
Width
1794 - 1802 mm
Width
1860 mm
Height
1495 - 1508 mm
Height
1695 mm
Max trunk capacity
1000 - 1050 L
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
Payload
450 - 510 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.50 s
Max Speed
197 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
In a competitive segment, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-5 stand out with distinct personalities, offering drivers a blend of style and functionality. While the Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the CX-5 captivates with its dynamic handling and upscale interior quality. Ultimately, choosing between these two compact SUVs comes down to personal preference, as both models deliver a compelling driving experience tailored to diverse lifestyles.
Audi Q2
VW Golf
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Audi Q2 stands out with its premium build quality and sharp handling, offering a luxury feel in a small package. Meanwhile, the Volkswagen Golf, beloved by many for its practicality and storied heritage, delivers a balanced ride with ample space and cutting-edge technology. While the Q2 appeals with its upscale design, the Golf wins with versatility and a slightly more budget-friendly approach.
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and youthful vibe, combining practicality with a touch of flair and advanced tech features that appeal to the modern, urban lifestyle.
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the X-Trail excels in spaciousness and versatility, making it an ideal choice for families and outdoor enthusiasts alike.
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and high-tech features, provides a pragmatic approach to everyday driving, emphasizing practicality and modernity.
Audi Q2
Mercedes B Class
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Audi Q2 stands out with its bold design and sporty handling, appealing to those seeking a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Mercedes B-Klasse emphasizes practicality and comfort, offering a spacious interior and advanced technology features that cater to families and daily commuters alike. Ultimately, the choice between these two premium models comes down to personal preference, whether one prioritizes agility or versatility.
Audi Q2
SEAT Arona
VS
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.