VS

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (300 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Mazda CX-5?

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Audi Q2

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q2 is markedly cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,134 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q2 uses 4.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers considerably more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers considerably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 162 Nm more.

Q2

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q2 is visibly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 299 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers markedly more boot space – 583 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 178 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries slightly more – 601 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q2 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,900
Q2

Audi Q2

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q2

The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.

details
A207341_overfull
A207339_overfull
A207364_overfull
A207355_overfull
A207349_overfull
A207346_overfull

Reviews Audi Q2

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
miles
14 Feb 2026, 20:00:47

ive really enjoyed my 2 audi q2s and still looking for a match .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Audi Q2
BMW 1 Series
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Audi Q2 and BMW 1er Reihe each offer distinct advantages that cater to different preferences. The Q2 impresses with its striking design, advanced technology, and a more spacious interior, making it a strong contender for those seeking a stylish …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q2
VW Golf
VS
The Audi Q2 trades the Golf’s down-to-earth practicality for a dash of city-cool style and a slightly raised driving position, so you’ll arrive looking sharper — but with a bit less rear-seat space and often a higher price. For buyers who value sensible packaging, ride comfort and everyday …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
Audi Q2
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 stands out with its youthful design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. Meanwhile, the Mercedes GLA offers a more luxurious experience with its refined interior and advanced technology features, …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 183 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
-
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
450 - 510 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.