@ Audi AG
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Audi Q2 vs Suzuki Vitara – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi Q2 or Suzuki Vitara?

Q2 @ Audi AG

Head-to-Head Showdown: Audi Q2 vs Suzuki Vitara

When it comes to compact SUVs, the Audi Q2 and Suzuki Vitara often spring to mind as top contenders in their class. Both models bring a mix of performance, innovation, and style to the table, appealing to distinct groups of consumers. We dive into a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, highlighting their technical aspects and innovations.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine Versatility and Performance

The Audi Q2 offers a wide range of engine options, starting with the efficient 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine producing 116 HP and extending all the way to the powerful 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine capable of 300 HP. This variety ensures there’s something for everyone, whether you prioritize fuel efficiency or sheer power. The Q2’s performance-oriented variant can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, reaching a top speed of 250 km/h.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara primarily focuses on fuel efficiency and practicality, with its Mild Hybrid and Full Hybrid engine options. The 1.4-liter petrol MHEV engine generates 129 HP, delivering a balanced performance suitable for urban and suburban environments. Despite its hybrid technology, the Vitara can reach 0 to 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds with a top speed of 190 km/h.

Q2 @ Audi AG

Innovative Transmission and Drive Systems

The Audi Q2 carries the edge in transmission technology with its dual-clutch automatic gearbox, providing a seamless and responsive shifting experience. It offers both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive options, catering to varying driving preferences and conditions.

Suzuki Vitara compensates with its lightweight automated manual transmission, ensuring smooth driving dynamics. Like its contender, it also offers both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive configurations, making it versatile for different terrains.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Efficiency and Environmental Friendliness

Fuel consumption is a key factor for any vehicle today. The Audi Q2 offers a range between 4.8 and 8.4 L/100km, depending on the engine choice, which is competitive for its power range. Its CO2 emissions range from 127 to 190 g/km, which positions it in the D to G efficiency classes.

The Suzuki Vitara takes a more eco-friendly approach, with its fuel consumption hovering between 5 and 5.6 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions range from 113 to 128 g/km, placing it in C to D classes. This makes the Vitara a strong contender for environmentally conscious buyers.

Q2 @ Audi AG

Interior and Cargo Space

Both SUVs offer seating for five passengers, but they differ in space optimization. The Audi Q2 features a trunk capacity between 355 and 405 liters, providing ample space for daily errands and weekend getaways.

The Suzuki Vitara, with a trunk ranging from 289 to 375 liters, offers slightly less cargo space. However, its simpler interior layout provides practicality and comfort, appealing to those who favor functionality over luxury.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Dimensions and Handling

The Audi Q2, measuring between 4208 and 4216 mm in length, boasts a stylish exterior with dynamic proportions. It’s slightly wider at up to 1802 mm when compared to the Vitara, which measures 1775 mm in width, and offers a lower center of gravity at just under 1508 mm in height. This contributes to a sportier driving feel.

Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara stands taller at 1595 mm, providing higher ground clearance ideal for rougher terrains. Though slightly more compact in length at 4185 mm, it ensures agility in urban settings.

Q2 @ Audi AG

Conclusion

The Audi Q2 and Suzuki Vitara each represent compelling choices within the compact SUV segment, catering to distinct audiences. The Q2 stands out for buyers looking for performance and luxury, with its advanced transmission and powerful engines. The Vitara, meanwhile, appeals to eco-conscious drivers and families, offering hybrid technology and practicality in a stylish package.

Ultimately, your choice between these two may come down to your priority, whether it's raw power and luxury or efficiency and practicality.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Vitara has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23600 £, while the Audi Q2 costs 24900 £. That’s a price difference of around 1286 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q2 manages with 4.80 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.

Q2 @ Audi AG

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 has a convincingly edge – offering 300 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 171 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 9.50 s. That’s about 4.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q2 performs distinct better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q2 pulls significantly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 165 Nm difference.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is slight lighter – 1255 kg compared to 1330 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q2 offers barely noticeable more room – 405 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Suzuki Vitara performs barely noticeable better – up to 1120 L, which is about 70 L more than the Audi Q2.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q2 clearly perceptible takes the win – 510 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q2 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q2 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,900
Q2 @ Audi AG

Audi Q2

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 8.1 L

Audi Q2

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.

details

Suzuki Vitara

5 (1)
rate

The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.

details
Audi Q2
Suzuki Vitara
Q2 @ Audi AG
Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
24900 - 43600 £
Price
23600 - 30900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 183 g/km
co2
113 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1330 - 1610 kg
Curb weight
1255 - 1395 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
Length
4208 - 4216 mm
Length
4185 mm
Width
1794 - 1802 mm
Width
1775 mm
Height
1495 - 1508 mm
Height
1595 mm
Max trunk capacity
1000 - 1050 L
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
Payload
450 - 510 kg
Payload
375 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Power HP
110 - 129 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7 s
Max Speed
197 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Power kW
81 - 95 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.