Compare performance (300 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Suzuki Vitara?
When it comes to compact SUVs, the Audi Q2 and Suzuki Vitara often spring to mind as top contenders in their class. Both models bring a mix of performance, innovation, and style to the table, appealing to distinct groups of consumers. We dive into a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, highlighting their technical aspects and innovations.
The Audi Q2 offers a wide range of engine options, starting with the efficient 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine producing 116 HP and extending all the way to the powerful 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine capable of 300 HP. This variety ensures there’s something for everyone, whether you prioritize fuel efficiency or sheer power. The Q2’s performance-oriented variant can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, reaching a top speed of 250 km/h.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara primarily focuses on fuel efficiency and practicality, with its Mild Hybrid and Full Hybrid engine options. The 1.4-liter petrol MHEV engine generates 129 HP, delivering a balanced performance suitable for urban and suburban environments. Despite its hybrid technology, the Vitara can reach 0 to 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds with a top speed of 190 km/h.
The Audi Q2 carries the edge in transmission technology with its dual-clutch automatic gearbox, providing a seamless and responsive shifting experience. It offers both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive options, catering to varying driving preferences and conditions.
Suzuki Vitara compensates with its lightweight automated manual transmission, ensuring smooth driving dynamics. Like its contender, it also offers both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive configurations, making it versatile for different terrains.
Fuel consumption is a key factor for any vehicle today. The Audi Q2 offers a range between 4.8 and 8.4 L/100km, depending on the engine choice, which is competitive for its power range. Its CO2 emissions range from 127 to 190 g/km, which positions it in the D to G efficiency classes.
The Suzuki Vitara takes a more eco-friendly approach, with its fuel consumption hovering between 5 and 5.6 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions range from 113 to 128 g/km, placing it in C to D classes. This makes the Vitara a strong contender for environmentally conscious buyers.
Both SUVs offer seating for five passengers, but they differ in space optimization. The Audi Q2 features a trunk capacity between 355 and 405 liters, providing ample space for daily errands and weekend getaways.
The Suzuki Vitara, with a trunk ranging from 289 to 375 liters, offers slightly less cargo space. However, its simpler interior layout provides practicality and comfort, appealing to those who favor functionality over luxury.
The Audi Q2, measuring between 4208 and 4216 mm in length, boasts a stylish exterior with dynamic proportions. It’s slightly wider at up to 1802 mm when compared to the Vitara, which measures 1775 mm in width, and offers a lower center of gravity at just under 1508 mm in height. This contributes to a sportier driving feel.
Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara stands taller at 1595 mm, providing higher ground clearance ideal for rougher terrains. Though slightly more compact in length at 4185 mm, it ensures agility in urban settings.
The Audi Q2 and Suzuki Vitara each represent compelling choices within the compact SUV segment, catering to distinct audiences. The Q2 stands out for buyers looking for performance and luxury, with its advanced transmission and powerful engines. The Vitara, meanwhile, appeals to eco-conscious drivers and families, offering hybrid technology and practicality in a stylish package.
Ultimately, your choice between these two may come down to your priority, whether it's raw power and luxury or efficiency and practicality.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Vitara is barely cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Audi Q2 costs 24,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q2 uses 4.8 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers markedly more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 116 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 93 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is only slightly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q2 offers very slightly more boot space – 405 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries slightly more – 510 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.
The Audi Q2 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.
details
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
127 - 183 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 510 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España