Compare performance (184 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or VW T-Roc?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the crowded compact SUV market, the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Roc emerge as two attractive options, each with its unique strengths and characteristics. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two models, focusing on their technical aspects, performance, and innovations to help you decide which vehicle might suit your needs better.
The Suzuki Vitara, with its sturdy and rugged design, measures 4185 mm in length, 1775 mm in width, and stands 1595 mm tall. It presents a balanced, aggressive stance that appeals to adventurers and city-dwellers alike. The payload capacity ranges from 375 kg to 395 kg, reflecting its practicality.
On the other hand, the VW T-Roc is slightly larger, showcasing a more modern aesthetic with its sharp lines and distinctive rear. The T-Roc stretches from 4236 mm to 4271 mm in length, and its width varies between 1811 mm and 1819 mm, while the height ranges from 1527 mm to 1584 mm. The T-Roc also boasts a higher trunk capacity of up to 445 liters, making it a more spacious option for those who prioritize cargo space.
Under the hood, the Suzuki Vitara offers a choice of petrol engine options, including a 1.4-liter MHEV engine that produces up to 129 HP and a full hybrid variant. The Vitara features both manual and automated manual transmissions, providing flexibility for drivers. In terms of acceleration, the Vitara can go from 0-100 km/h in as little as 9.5 seconds, and it achieves a decent top speed of 190 km/h. Fuel efficiency is commendable too, with consumption figures ranging from 5 to 5.6 L/100 km.
In contrast, the VW T-Roc provides a broader spectrum of engine choices, ranging from efficient petrol engines to powerful diesel options. Engine outputs can go up to an impressive 300 HP, with the more powerful variants capable of a dynamic 0-100 km/h sprint in just 4.9 seconds. The T-Roc also offers both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, enhancing the driving experience. Fuel consumption varies more widely, from as low as 4.7 L/100 km to 8.5 L/100 km, depending on the variant selected.
Both the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Roc provide front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, catering to different driving preferences and conditions. The Vitara's all-wheel drive is particularly commendable for off-road capabilities, reflecting its SUV heritage. The T-Roc, on the other hand, leans towards a more on-road driving experience, with its sporty dynamics further accentuated by its optional performance features.
In terms of technology, the Suzuki Vitara comes equipped with a user-friendly infotainment system with smartphone integration, ensuring that drivers stay connected while on the road. The 2024 model also introduces safety features such as advanced driver-assist systems that enhance overall security.
The VW T-Roc raises the bar with its tech offerings. It features an intuitive digital cockpit that encapsulates modern infotainment standards and customizable display options. Additionally, advanced safety techniques and driving aids such as adaptive cruise control and lane assist make the T-Roc a more tech-savvy choice.
Ultimately, the decision between the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Roc will depend on individual preferences and priorities. If you are looking for a rugged, practical SUV that excels in fuel efficiency and offers good off-road capabilities, the Vitara is an excellent choice. However, if you desire a more technologically advanced vehicle with a modern design and superior performance options, the T-Roc stands out.
Both models deliver reliable performance and comfort, making them worthy contenders in the compact SUV segment. Consider your needs and desires carefully to determine which vehicle will provide the best driving experience for you.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Vitara is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,867 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers a bit more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers a bit more torque with 307 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 57 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is somewhat lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 210 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more boot space – 375 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries moderately more – 515 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España