VS

Audi Q3 vs Honda CR-V – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Audi Q3 or Honda CR-V fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q3 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38200 £, while the Honda CR-V costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4543 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda CR-V manages with 0.90 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Audi Q3 with 1.70 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Audi Q3 performs evident better – achieving up to 119 km, about 40 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V @ hondanews.eu

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 has a evident edge – offering 272 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q3 performs a bit better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Honda CR-V tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 45 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q3 pulls slightly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.

Q3 @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q3 is slightly lighter – 1635 kg compared to 1821 kg. The difference is around 186 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers evident more room – 617 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Honda CR-V performs to a small extent better – up to 1710 L, which is about 324 L more than the Audi Q3.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q3 slightly takes the win – 535 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Honda CR-V shows itself to be only a minor advantage and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £42,800
42223_CR-V_2015

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 - 6.7 L
  • Electric Range : 79 km
details

Audi Q3

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q3 seamlessly blends practicality with luxury, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers and adventure seekers alike. With its striking design and sophisticated interior, the Q3 offers a premium driving experience that caters to both comfort and style. As a compact SUV, it effortlessly navigates through city streets while providing ample space for passengers and cargo.

details
A188605_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188610_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188613_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1814467_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188626_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Honda CR-V

5 (1)
rate

The Honda CR-V presents a blend of practicality and comfort, making it a reliable choice for families and adventure seekers alike. With its spacious interior and refined design, it offers a pleasant driving experience whether in urban environments or on long road trips. This model also boasts a range of advanced safety features, enhancing driver confidence and passenger security.

details
42223_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42220_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42219_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu
42241_CR-V_2015 @ hondanews.eu

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and CUPRA Terramar stand out with their distinct design and performance characteristics. The Q3 impresses with its polished interior and advanced technology, making it a solid choice for those who prioritize luxury and comfort. Meanwhile, the CUPRA Terramar offers a sportier driving experience, blending dynamic handling with a unique flair that appeals to enthusiast drivers looking for something more spirited.
Audi Q3
Honda CR-V
Q3
CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
38200 - 52900 £
Price
42800 - 52100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
19 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 57 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
4531 mm
Length
4706 mm
Width
1859 mm
Width
1866 mm
Height
1559 - 1601 mm
Height
1673 - 1684 mm
Max trunk capacity
1196 - 1386 L
Max trunk capacity
1634 - 1710 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
208 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 195 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1993 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Honda

Similar Comparisons

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Honda CR-V
Kia Sportage
VS
Honda CR-V
MG HS/EHS
VS
Audi Q3
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and VW Tayron deliver a blend of style and performance that appeals to a diverse range of buyers. While the Q3 boasts Audi's signature luxury and advanced technology, the Tayron offers practicality and value without sacrificing modern features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to a buyer's preference for premium aesthetics versus budget-friendly functionality.
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Audi Q3
CUPRA Formentor
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Audi Q3 and CUPRA Formentor stand out with their distinct personalities and performance characteristics. The Q3 offers a refined interior and a smooth ride, making it an ideal choice for those prioritizing comfort and luxury. On the other hand, the CUPRA Formentor combines sportiness with practicality, featuring a bold design and a dynamic driving experience that appeals to enthusiasts looking for a thrill behind the wheel.
Audi Q3
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Nissan Qashqai both offer compelling features tailored to different consumer preferences. The Q3 impresses with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, providing a premium driving experience, while the Qashqai stands out for its practicality and value for money. Ultimately, buyers must weigh the Q3's upscale charm against the Qashqai's affordability and spaciousness to determine which model best suits their lifestyle.
Audi Q3
Audi Q5
VS
The Audi Q3 and Q5 offer distinctive styles and features that cater to different driving preferences, with the Q3 appealing to those seeking a compact SUV with agility and urban maneuverability. In contrast, the Q5 provides more space and a robust performance, making it an ideal choice for families and adventure enthusiasts alike. Both models showcase Audi's commitment to luxury and technology, ensuring drivers enjoy a premium experience on and off the road.
Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.