Compare performance (243 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Honda CR-V?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to the SUVs market, two names frequently pop up: the Ford Kuga and the Honda CR-V. Both vehicles offer a compelling blend of practicality, technology, and performance, but how do they compare? This article will delve into the technical aspects and innovations of both models to help you make an informed decision.
The Ford Kuga kicks off the competition with a range of engine types, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options. The Kuga's petrol engines deliver power ranging from 150 to 243 HP, with torque figures peaking at 240 Nm. It offers various transmission options, including manual and automatic, with a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive. Acceleration is impressive, with times of 7.3 to 9.5 seconds for 0-100 km/h, depending on the variant.
On the other hand, the Honda CR-V provides a robust lineup as well, primarily featuring full hybrid and plug-in hybrid engine choices. It boasts a power output of up to 184 HP, generating a significant torque of 335 Nm, highlighting its efficiency. With a CVT transmission and front or all-wheel drive capabilities, the CR-V also achieves similar acceleration figures ranging from 9.0 to 9.5 seconds.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor for many SUV buyers. The Ford Kuga shines here with consumption figures from 5.3 to 6.4 L/100 km across its range, attaining CO2 emissions as low as 122 g/km. The Kuga's plug-in hybrid version offers a remarkable electric range of 69 km, making it an attractive choice for urban driving.
On the Honda CR-V front, the fuel consumption ranges from 6.0 to 6.7 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions also competitive at around 135 g/km. Its plug-in hybrid variant tops the electric range, reaching 79 km, which can be a game changer for those looking to reduce their gasoline reliance.
When it comes to size, the Honda CR-V is slightly longer at 4706 mm compared to the Ford Kuga, which measures between 4604 to 4645 mm. Both SUVs feature a spacious five-seat configuration, but the CR-V offers superior trunk capacity, with 579 to 617 L compared to Kuga’s maximum of 412 L. This makes the CR-V more appealing for families or those needing extra storage space.
In terms of height, the Kuga provides a range of 1673 to 1681 mm, while the CR-V stands at about 1684 mm, enabling more headroom for passengers. The width of both vehicles is comparable, with the Kuga measuring 1882 mm and the CR-V slightly narrower at 1866 mm.
Both vehicles showcase their commitment to technology and comfort. The Ford Kuga is equipped with Ford’s latest SYNC infotainment system, offering advanced connectivity options, including smartphone integration. Furthermore, Kuga provides numerous safety features, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
The Honda CR-V, on the other hand, features its own advanced infotainment system, integrating Apple CarPlay and Android Auto functionality. The CR-V’s safety suite also includes Honda Sensing Technologies, which provide a range of driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and convenience on the road.
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Honda CR-V ultimately comes down to your preferences and lifestyle needs. The Kuga garners attention for its dynamic performance and multiple engine options, while the CR-V excels in trunk space, hybrid efficiency, and advanced safety technologies. Both models present strong cases in their respective categories, making either choice dependent on personal priorities in vehicle functionality and design.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Kuga is slightly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,958 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Honda CR-V offers a bit more range – reaching up to 78 km, about 10 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers clearly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers noticeably more torque with 335 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is somewhat lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 295 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries a bit more – 550 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The Ford Kuga is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.
details
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
78 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
59 - 152 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,866 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España