Compare performance (243 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Honda CR-V?
When it comes to the SUVs market, two names frequently pop up: the Ford Kuga and the Honda CR-V. Both vehicles offer a compelling blend of practicality, technology, and performance, but how do they compare? This article will delve into the technical aspects and innovations of both models to help you make an informed decision.
The Ford Kuga kicks off the competition with a range of engine types, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options. The Kuga's petrol engines deliver power ranging from 150 to 243 HP, with torque figures peaking at 240 Nm. It offers various transmission options, including manual and automatic, with a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive. Acceleration is impressive, with times of 7.3 to 9.5 seconds for 0-100 km/h, depending on the variant.
On the other hand, the Honda CR-V provides a robust lineup as well, primarily featuring full hybrid and plug-in hybrid engine choices. It boasts a power output of up to 184 HP, generating a significant torque of 335 Nm, highlighting its efficiency. With a CVT transmission and front or all-wheel drive capabilities, the CR-V also achieves similar acceleration figures ranging from 9.0 to 9.5 seconds.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor for many SUV buyers. The Ford Kuga shines here with consumption figures from 5.3 to 6.4 L/100 km across its range, attaining CO2 emissions as low as 122 g/km. The Kuga's plug-in hybrid version offers a remarkable electric range of 69 km, making it an attractive choice for urban driving.
On the Honda CR-V front, the fuel consumption ranges from 6.0 to 6.7 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions also competitive at around 135 g/km. Its plug-in hybrid variant tops the electric range, reaching 79 km, which can be a game changer for those looking to reduce their gasoline reliance.
When it comes to size, the Honda CR-V is slightly longer at 4706 mm compared to the Ford Kuga, which measures between 4604 to 4645 mm. Both SUVs feature a spacious five-seat configuration, but the CR-V offers superior trunk capacity, with 579 to 617 L compared to Kuga’s maximum of 412 L. This makes the CR-V more appealing for families or those needing extra storage space.
In terms of height, the Kuga provides a range of 1673 to 1681 mm, while the CR-V stands at about 1684 mm, enabling more headroom for passengers. The width of both vehicles is comparable, with the Kuga measuring 1882 mm and the CR-V slightly narrower at 1866 mm.
Both vehicles showcase their commitment to technology and comfort. The Ford Kuga is equipped with Ford’s latest SYNC infotainment system, offering advanced connectivity options, including smartphone integration. Furthermore, Kuga provides numerous safety features, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
The Honda CR-V, on the other hand, features its own advanced infotainment system, integrating Apple CarPlay and Android Auto functionality. The CR-V’s safety suite also includes Honda Sensing Technologies, which provide a range of driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and convenience on the road.
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Honda CR-V ultimately comes down to your preferences and lifestyle needs. The Kuga garners attention for its dynamic performance and multiple engine options, while the CR-V excels in trunk space, hybrid efficiency, and advanced safety technologies. Both models present strong cases in their respective categories, making either choice dependent on personal priorities in vehicle functionality and design.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Kuga has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8529 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda CR-V manages with 2.60 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.80 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Honda CR-V performs somewhat better – achieving up to 78 km, about 10 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 243 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Honda CR-V pulls evident stronger with 335 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is to a small extent lighter – 1526 kg compared to 1821 kg. The difference is around 295 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers clearly perceptible more room – 617 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 205 L.
When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga somewhat takes the win – 550 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The Ford Kuga is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
42800 - 52100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
78 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
59 - 152 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1866 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España