Audi VS Mazda

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Mazda CX-5 each offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the Q3 impresses with its luxurious interior and cutting-edge technology, the CX-5 shines with its sportier handling and value-driven pricing. Ultimately, choosing between these two vehicles hinges on whether you prioritize premium features or a dynamic driving experience.

Audi

details

Mazda

details

The compact SUV segment is a fiercely competitive arena, with manufacturers constantly raising the bar for performance, comfort, and technology. Today, we pit the Audi Q3 against the Mazda CX-5, two models known for their distinctive features and engineering excellence. In this comparison, we'll delve into the technical specifications and innovations that each vehicle brings to the table.

Design and Dimensions

Both the Audi Q3 and the Mazda CX-5 boast sleek designs and spacious interiors, but they cater to slightly different aesthetics. The Q3, measuring 4484 mm in length, 1849 mm in width, and 1585 mm in height, exudes a modern, sporty vibe. On the other hand, the CX-5 is larger in length at 4575 mm and stands taller at 1680 mm, giving it a more commanding presence on the road.

Engine and Performance

The Audi Q3 offers a selection of petrol and diesel engines with power outputs ranging from 150 hp to a robust 245 hp. This engine lineup comes with efficient fuel consumption rates, with the most economical variant achieving only 5.5 L/100km. The Q3's acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be as swift as 5.8 seconds, making it a dynamic choice for those seeking performance.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-5 features petrol and diesel engines as well, delivering power output between 150 hp and 194 hp. The CX-5 is not far behind in fuel efficiency, registering a minimum consumption of 5.6 L/100km. However, it lags slightly in acceleration, with the best performing variant reaching 100 km/h in 9.2 seconds.

Transmission and Handling

The Q3 offers both manual and automatic transmissions, including a sophisticated dual-clutch system. This results in smooth gear transitions and an engaging driving experience. The Q3 is available in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, enhancing its versatility on various terrains.

The CX-5 also comes with manual and automatic transmission options. However, its focus on driver engagement shines through its well-tuned chassis and steering feel, which are especially appealing to enthusiasts. Like the Q3, the CX-5 offers all-wheel drive, making it a capable performer in challenging conditions.

Interior Comfort and Technology

Stepping inside the Audi Q3, you'll be met with a luxurious cabin adorned with high-quality materials and state-of-the-art technology. With a trunk capacity of 530 liters, it comfortably accommodates luggage and groceries alike. Additional features like a customizable digital cockpit and advanced infotainment systems reflect Audi's commitment to innovation.

The Mazda CX-5 does not fall short either, with a well-designed interior and a user-friendly infotainment system. Its trunk capacity is also impressive at 522 liters. The SUV's minimalist design philosophy ensures a comfortable ride, complemented by ergonomic seating and high-quality materials used throughout the cabin.

Safety and Assistance Features

Both models come equipped with an array of safety features. The Q3's advanced driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, provide an added layer of security for passengers. Furthermore, the Q3 excels in crash test ratings, further solidifying its reputation as a safe choice.

The CX-5 features Mazda's i-Activsense technologies, which include smart brake support and blind-spot monitoring. These systems help to enhance the driver’s awareness and the vehicle's overall safety. Both SUVs have performed admirably in safety tests, with the CX-5 also boasting commendable ratings.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Mazda CX-5 ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If you desire a sportier performance with luxury touches, the Q3 is a compelling finalist. However, if you value practicality and engaging driving experiences, the CX-5 stands out as a remarkable contender. Both vehicles represent excellence in the compact SUV segment, catering to a range of needs and desires amongst drivers.

Audi
Mazda

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 32800 - 45200 £
Price
about 27600 - 44300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 8.5 L
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
143 - 193 g/km
co2
146 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
58 - 60 L
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1525 - 1735 kg
Curb weight
1567 - 1800 kg
Trunk capacity
530 L
Trunk capacity
510 - 522 L
Length
4484 - 4500 mm
Length
4575 mm
Width
1843 - 1849 mm
Width
1845 mm
Height
1567 - 1585 mm
Height
1680 mm
Payload
455 - 495 kg
Payload
434 - 508 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 245 HP
Power HP
150 - 194 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 - 11.1 s
Max Speed
200 - 237 km/h
Max Speed
188 - 208 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
213 - 445 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 180 kW
Power kW
110 - 143 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Top speed
200 - 237 km/h
Top speed
188 - 208 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2021 - 2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.