In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced tech features, appealing to those who prioritize comfort and sophistication. On the other hand, the Ford Kuga offers a more practical and budget-friendly option, boasting versatility and ample cargo space for families on the go. While the Q3 impresses with premium materials and performance, the Kuga shines in utility and value, making both models compelling choices for different types of drivers.
As the SUV market continues to expand, two prominent contenders—the Audi Q3 and the Ford Kuga—stand out. Both vehicles bring their unique features and innovations to the table, catering to a diverse set of drivers. In this article, we will delve into the technical aspects, performance, and features of each model to help you decide which SUV suits your needs best.
The Audi Q3 presents a versatile array of engine choices, with options ranging from efficient petrol and diesel engines. Power output varies from 150 HP in the base model to an impressive 245 HP in the sporty variants. The Q3 offers a 0-100 km/h acceleration time that can be as quick as 5.8 seconds, combined with a top speed of 237 km/h.
In contrast, the Ford Kuga also boasts a variety of engine choices, including petrol engines along with full hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. The power range starts at 150 HP but can go up to 243 HP, with the top-performing model achieving 0-100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds. However, the Kuga's maximum speed is slightly lower, capped at 200 km/h.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, both models impress with their competitive consumption ratings. The Audi Q3 shows a consumption range between 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km depending on the engine variant. The hybrid performance options keep CO2 emissions between 143 and 192 g/km.
The Ford Kuga takes a step further in terms of eco-friendliness, especially with its hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants. The Kuga can achieve a remarkable consumption figure as low as 0.9 L/100 km in electric-only mode, with CO2 emissions for the hybrid variants dropping as low as 20 g/km. For those keen on reducing their carbon footprint, the Kuga's electric range of up to 69 km is notable.
Both the Audi Q3 and Ford Kuga are designed with a focus on passenger comfort and modern aesthetics. The Q3's interior is characterized by high-quality materials, spacious seating for five, and a trunk capacity of 530 liters, making it a practical choice for families or long trips.
The Ford Kuga, while slightly less spacious with a trunk capacity of 412 liters, offers a modern and tech-savvy interior. The Kuga is equipped with Ford's SYNC infotainment system and can also be outfitted with a panoramic sunroof for an enhanced driving experience.
Safety is paramount in both vehicles. The Audi Q3 is equipped with an array of advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and a comprehensive airbag system. Its precise build quality adds an extra layer of reassurance on the road.
On the other hand, the Ford Kuga also emphasizes safety, integrating technologies such as automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and a host of driver-assist systems. Both models have received favorable safety ratings, making them suitable choices for families.
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and Ford Kuga ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The Audi Q3 leans towards luxury, sporty performance, and stellar interior quality, while the Ford Kuga distinguishes itself with eco-friendly options, practicality, and advanced driver-assistance technologies. Both vehicles provide a significant value proposition and are well-suited for contemporary drivers seeking an SUV that meets their lifestyle needs.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 32800 - 45200
£
|
Price
about 34200 - 45000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
69
km
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4
kWh
|
co2
143 - 193
g/km
|
co2
20 - 145
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 - 60
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1525 - 1735
kg
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859
kg
|
Trunk capacity
530
L
|
Trunk capacity
412
L
|
Length
4484 - 4500
mm
|
Length
4604 - 4645
mm
|
Width
1843 - 1849
mm
|
Width
1882
mm
|
Height
1567 - 1585
mm
|
Height
1673 - 1681
mm
|
Payload
455 - 495
kg
|
Payload
541 - 550
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
150 - 245
HP
|
Power HP
150 - 243
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 9.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.5
s
|
Max Speed
200 - 237
km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Torque
240
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
110 - 180
kW
|
Power kW
110 - 178
kW
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1497 - 2488
cm3
|
Top speed
200 - 237
km/h
|
Top speed
195 - 200
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.