VS

Audi Q3 vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 34,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Nissan Interstar?

Audi Q3 vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • markedly lighter

Nissan Interstar

  • very slightly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Interstar is very slightly cheaper – starting at 34,900 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,293 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 5.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers considerably more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 291 km more than the Audi Q3.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers visibly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers only slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is markedly lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 418 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries substantially more – 1,447 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 912 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
Audi Q3
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
Audi Q3
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Price
34,900 - 55,700 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
0 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
5,685 - 6,315 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
2,498 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
10,800 - 13,000 L
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
965 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.