VS

Audi Q3 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Audi Q3 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • considerably more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 237,172 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 14.3 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers considerably more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 328 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 500 Nm more.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is substantially lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,025 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers a bit more boot space – 555 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 67 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries clearly more – 840 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 305 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.7 - 8.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 109 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
Audi Q3
Mercedes EQA
VS
Audi Q3 vs Mercedes EQA: two compact premium crossovers that target similar buyers but take very different technical routes. The Q3 is a conventional petrol/diesel (and mild-hybrid) compact SUV that focuses on practicality and traditional driving feel, while the EQA is Mercedes’ small electric SUV …
Audi Q3
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
Del
16 Jun 2026, 12:27:22

Very comfortable and very enjoyable to drive, interior very pleasant. Only missing the automatic controls.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
serpimg_Pd0UC9

Reviews Rolls-Royce Cullinan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
Audi A5 Sportback
VS
The Audi Q3 and the Audi A5 Sportback both bring distinct strengths to the luxury compact market. The Q3, with its SUV stance, offers a versatile and roomy interior ideal for those seeking practicality and elevated driving positions, while the A5 Sportback boasts a sleek, coupe-like design paired …
Audi Q3
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Nissan Qashqai both offer compelling features tailored to different consumer preferences. The Q3 impresses with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, providing a premium driving experience, while the Qashqai stands out for its …
Audi Q3
Hyundai Tucson
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology, offering a luxurious driving experience. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Tucson impresses with its spacious cabin, user-friendly features, and excellent value for money. Both models have …
Audi Q3
BYD Atto 3
VS
In our latest comparison, the Audi Q3 and BYD Atto 3 go head-to-head in a battle between luxury and electric innovation. The Audi Q3 captivates with its upscale interior and agile handling, making it a top choice for those seeking a premium experience. Meanwhile, the BYD Atto 3 impresses with its …
Audi Q3
Audi A5 Avant
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q3 or the Audi A5 Avant is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a …
Audi Q3
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q3 or the Toyota Corolla Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q3
Volvo XC40
VS
The Audi Q3 and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Audi Q3
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,200 - 54,200 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
109 - 119 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 199 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Audi
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q3 have?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.