Compare performance (272 HP vs 449 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or BYD Atto 3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, two models stand out with their compelling features and contrasting powertrains. The Audi Q3, a staple in the luxury compact SUV market, faces a formidable contender in the electric newcomer, the BYD Atto 3. Here's an in-depth look at how these two vehicles stack up against each other.
The Audi Q3 is known for its diverse engine offerings. Buyers can choose between petrol and diesel options, with power outputs ranging from 150 to 245 HP. This flexibility extends to the transmission, offering both manual and dual-clutch automatic gearboxes, catering to different driving preferences. The Q3 accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as low as 5.8 seconds, reaching a top speed of up to 237 km/h with its all-wheel-drive options.
In contrast, the BYD Atto 3 brings a different flavor to performance with its fully electric propulsion, delivering a consistent 204 HP. Acceleration is brisk, taking just 7.3 seconds to reach 100 km/h, though its top speed caps at 160 km/h. Its electric drivetrain provides a different kind of driving experience, one that is smooth and silent yet still engaging.
While the Audi Q3 is engineered for performance, its fuel consumption ranges from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km depending on the engine choice, alongside CO2 emissions between 143 to 193 g/km. As expected, efficiency varies with the power of the engine chosen.
The BYD Atto 3, equipped with an electric drivetrain, excels in terms of eco-friendliness with zero emissions and a consumption rate of 16 kWh/100 km. It offers an impressive electric range of 420 km on a single charge, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing sustainability.
Both SUVs accommodate five passengers comfortably, yet subtly differ in interior space and layout. The Audi Q3 is slightly longer at 4500 mm, offering a substantial trunk capacity of 530 liters, which is ideal for families and long journeys.
The BYD Atto 3 measures slightly shorter at 4455 mm and offers a trunk capacity of 440 liters. However, its thoughtful interior design maximizes passenger comfort, integrating futuristic styling elements with practicality.
Audi is renowned for its cutting-edge technology, and the Q3 is no exception. It offers a virtual cockpit with multiple display configurations, advanced driver-assistance systems, and connectivity features that integrate seamlessly with various smart devices.
On the other hand, the BYD Atto 3 provides a high-tech approach tailored to an electric future, with a sophisticated infotainment system, energy-efficient features, and driving assistance technologies that complement its electric identity.
The Audi Q3 remains an appealing choice for those seeking luxury combined with diverse performance options. Meanwhile, the BYD Atto 3 represents the shift toward sustainable driving with its all-electric powertrain and modern design.
Choosing between these two outstanding vehicles depends on whether buyers want the traditional power of the Audi Q3 or the innovative electric essence of the BYD Atto 3. Regardless of the decision, both SUVs offer compelling characteristics that enhance the driving experience.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Audi Q3 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 334 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 391 km more than the Audi Q3.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers noticeably more torque with 560 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The BYD Atto 3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
BYD
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España