Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q3 vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Volvo S60?
Audi Q3 vs Volvo S60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q3
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Audi Q3 is moderately cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Audi Q3 with 1.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 25 km more than the Volvo S60.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 183 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm more.
Q3
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is marginally lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,715 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers moderately more boot space – 488 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 61 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries somewhat more – 535 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Audi Q3
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q3
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Audi Q3
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.