VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Citroen C5 Aircross comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Citroen C5 Aircross?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Citroen C5 Aircross: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Citroen C5 Aircross

4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen C5 Aircross is markedly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,580 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Citroen C5 Aircross. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers moderately more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 72 km more than the Citroen C5 Aircross.

C5 Aircross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Citroen C5 Aircross takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C5 Aircross is noticeably lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 406 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers very slightly more boot space – 565 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries marginally more – 515 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Citroen C5 Aircross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Citroen C5 Aircross

The Citroën C5 Aircross feels like a sofa on wheels, delivering a calm, floaty ride and clever packaging that makes life with luggage and kids noticeably easier. Quirky French styling and a supremely practical, family-focused cabin mean it quietly wins hearts by prioritising comfort over showroom bravado.

details
a9203463-62b0a96fb4625
a9203203-62b0a97459d8e
a9201305-62b0a98f68101
citroenc5aircrosshybrid225069-62b0a8a3075bb

Reviews Citroen C5 Aircross

4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Claude Juillet
3 May 2026, 14:17:36

I drive the 1.2 petrol hybrid from new since January 2026, which was registered in November 2025. Great car to drive. However, for tall person like myself, there is not enough room for your left keg to stretch and cramps happen in long journeys. Acceleration from start is better than my older 1.6 diesel c4 picasso. Overall best car I ever had, although infotainment a bit dodgy with a left hand and not at all practical. I minor inconvenience!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jan Hansen
10 Apr 2026, 21:38:06

It's a pleasant car; it's not coarse or brutal. As a 60-year-old, I don't need acceleration or top speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
privat
27 Mar 2026, 16:55:05

Cars like the C5 Aircross are probably one reason why Stellantis is almost bankrupt — or already is.
Uncomfortable and completely unsuitable for long-distance driving.
Huge on the outside, small on the inside.
Extremely uncomfortable seats, poor infotainment, very bad driver aids (360° camera, cruise control, lane-keep assist, navigation… are really awful), confusing, poor road manners, loud engine and noisy wind.
I can only hope that I’ll never again be forced to drive this vehicle.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alexis vasquez
15 Feb 2026, 21:03:58

I find the Citroën better suited to my daily driving — more comfortable and efficient, with a softer suspension compared with the firmer Toyota Cross.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
Citroen C5 Aircross
DS Automobiles DS 7
VS
Two French SUVs go head-to-head: the Citroën C5 Aircross brings cushy, family-focused comfort while the DS 7 poses as the sharper, more upscale pick. We’ll judge them on space, ride, tech and running costs to tell you whether to buy sensible comfort or fashionable flair — the driveway’s decision is …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a sofa on wheels — prioritising pillowy ride comfort, acres of rear-seat space and family-friendly practicality, while the Peugeot 3008 swaps that float for sharper steering, a classier cabin and more engaging driving manners. Choose the C5 Aircross for comfort and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Explorer EV put a premium compact luxury electric SUV up against a larger, family-focused electric crossover — one emphasizes refined driving dynamics and upscale interiors, the other prioritizes space, practicality and towing capability. I’ll compare range, …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Peugeot 5008
VS
The Citroën C5 Aircross is the sofa-like French cruiser that pampers passengers with magic-carpet suspension and outrageously comfy seats, while the Peugeot 5008 is the sharper, more practical grown-up — genuinely seven-seater flexibility and a cabin that feels a touch more premium. Choose the C5 …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Renault Austral
VS
Unsure whether the Citroen C5 Aircross or the Renault Austral is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Citroen C5 Aircross

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
29,100 - 43,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
81 - 520 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 121 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 2,184 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
565 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
446 - 471 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Citroen
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.