Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-60 – Which model is better for everyday use?
Two cars, one duel: Audi Q4 e-tron meets Mazda CX-60.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Q4 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi Q4 e-tron has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 39600 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 2348 £.
As for range, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs significantly better – achieving up to 554 km, about 490 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron has a slight edge – offering 340 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Audi Q4 e-tron tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q4 e-tron pulls slightly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 129 Nm difference.
Q4 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2035 kg. The difference is around 145 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers minimal more room – 570 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs to a small extent better – up to 1726 L, which is about 236 L more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Audi Q4 e-tron proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q4 e-tron is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £39,600
@ Audi AG
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda CX-60
|
@ Audi AG
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39600 - 58800 £
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2035 - 2235 kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4588 mm
|
Length
4745 mm
|
|
Width
1865 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1614 - 1632 mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1460 - 1490 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
What drive types are available for the Audi Q4 e-tron?
The Audi Q4 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.