VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Mazda CX-60?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • barely more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,957 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers substantially more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 529 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers barely more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers a bit more torque with 679 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 129 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 145 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers only slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries a bit more – 612 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.