VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or MG HS?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs MG HS: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

MG HS

4.8 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG HS is markedly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,723 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 492 km more than the MG HS.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the MG HS takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 329 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is somewhat lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 300 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers marginally more boot space – 535 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries clearly more – 515 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG HS
MG MGS9
VS
Choosing between the MG HS and the MG MGS9 comes down to whether you value compact practicality and efficiency or a larger, more upmarket presence and space. This quick comparison will focus on driving feel, interior room, technology and running costs to help you pick the best fit.
Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
Audi Q4 e-tron
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.8 (10 Reviews)
rate
Ste
5 Jun 2026, 12:05:05

Hg: clearly the price, the equipment, the power, and of course the 7-year warranty, not just 3.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jose
3 Jun 2026, 15:41:56

Very competitive price
Very good and adequate finishes
Premium features
Extremely quiet

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Frequently compared as well

MG HS
Geely Starray
VS
The MG HS and Geely Starray are two value-focused compact SUVs that compete on style, tech and day-to-day practicality — the MG HS offers familiar SUV proportions and a straightforward package, while the Starray pushes a more modern, gadget-rich approach. This quick comparison will focus on driving …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal and the MG HS puts a modern electric fastback (the BYD Seal) up against a traditional compact SUV (the MG HS) that prioritizes practicality and interior space. This quick guide focuses on real-world driving feel, running costs, tech and ownership considerations so you can …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Nissan Qashqai
MG HS
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the MG HS helps you decide between a well-proven, refined compact SUV and a value-packed alternative with strong equipment levels. The Qashqai emphasises ride comfort, build quality and established resale while the MG HS offers more kit for the money, a generous …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
MG HS
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Comparing the MG HS and the MG MGS6 EV lets you weigh a petrol-powered compact SUV against MG’s electric alternative. This quick guide highlights differences in driving feel, efficiency, interior space, tech and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your routine.
Audi Q4 e-tron
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
MG
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.