Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs BYD Tang - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (490 HP vs 517 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 64300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or BYD Tang?
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi Q6 e-tron has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 54400 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Audi Q6 e-tron: with 15.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly more efficient than the BYD Tang with 24 kWh. That’s a difference of about 8.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs a bit better – achieving up to 656 km, about 126 km more than the BYD Tang.
Tang
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 517 HP compared to 490 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the BYD Tang takes 4.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs slightly better – reaching 230 km/h, while the BYD Tang tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 855 Nm compared to 680 Nm. That’s about 175 Nm difference.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: BYD Tang offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Audi Q6 e-tron is slightly lighter – 2200 kg compared to 2630 kg. The difference is around 430 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers convincingly more room – 526 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 291 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BYD Tang performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1655 L, which is about 126 L more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.
When it comes to payload, BYD Tang hardly perceptible takes the win – 575 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q6 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Audi Q6 e-tron
BYD Tang
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £54,400
Audi Q6 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
5 (2 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
BYD Tang
The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
BYD Tang
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
64300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
2630 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
4970 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
1955 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1745 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1655 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
BYD
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.