Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Which model is better for everyday use?
Q6 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43300 £, while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54400 £. That’s a price difference of around 11143 £.
As for range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs significantly better – achieving up to 656 km, about 596 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron has a convincingly edge – offering 490 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 221 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 17 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls distinct stronger with 855 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 315 Nm difference.
Q6 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is evident lighter – 1792 kg compared to 2200 kg. The difference is around 408 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers slightly more room – 526 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs noticeable better – up to 1529 L, which is about 373 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque hardly perceptible takes the win – 600 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Audi Q6 e-tron shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £54,400
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
5 (2 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Audi Q6 e-tron
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
|
@ Audi AG
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.