Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (490 HP vs 635 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 78600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi Q6 e-tron has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 54400 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 78600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24172 £.
As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs convincingly better – achieving up to 656 km, about 538 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Range Rover Sport
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 635 HP compared to 490 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Audi Q6 e-tron takes 4.40 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs evident better – reaching 290 km/h, while the Audi Q6 e-tron tops out at 230 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls slight stronger with 855 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Audi Q6 e-tron is hardly perceptible lighter – 2200 kg compared to 2390 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers to a small extent more room – 647 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 121 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs minimal better – up to 1529 L, which is about 38 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport clearly perceptible takes the win – 830 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 290 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Audi Q6 e-tron proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q6 e-tron is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £54,400
Audi Q6 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q6 e-tron
5 (2 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
78600 - 175700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
61 - 266 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
4970 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
2043 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1814 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
640 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
290 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.