VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Omoda 9 comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 537 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 45,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Omoda 9?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Omoda 9: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Omoda 9

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • very slightly more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 9 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 45,300 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,086 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers considerably more range – reaching up to 668 km, about 523 km more than the Omoda 9.

9

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 9 offers very slightly more power – delivering 537 HP compared to 490 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Omoda 9 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers clearly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 650 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q6 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,200 kg compared to 2,270 kg. The difference is around 70 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers somewhat more boot space – 526 L compared to 471 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries somewhat more – 540 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 93 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lynk & Co 08
Omoda 9
VS
The Lynk & Co 08 and the Omoda 9 are two fresh contenders in the compact SUV segment, each promising standout styling, modern tech and family-friendly space. This quick comparison focuses on the real differences in driving feel, interior quality, fuel efficiency and value so you can decide which …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits two premium electric SUVs that blend luxury, technology and everyday practicality. If you're choosing between the Q6 e-tron and the GLC EQ, this comparison will walk through driving dynamics, range, interior comfort and value to help you …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details
A242848_medium
A242855_medium
A244272_medium

Reviews Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:29:37

A slightly inflated price relative to the equipment included in this car.

Bula
11 Oct 2025, 08:59:08

Comfortable, but feels a bit firmer (over small bumps) than the Q5. You can tell the car has some heft!! The electric power — 388 PS / 285 kW BEV — is incredible. The battery drops pretty quickly if you push the beast a little. The advertised 600 km range is generous on paper; expect more like 500, or even 450 in winter. The onboard technology is surprising and pushed to the extreme. After trying it, it's hard to go back to a non-electric model.

Omoda 9

The Omoda 9 blends bold, contemporary styling with a surprisingly spacious and well-appointed interior that punches above its class. It offers a composed, comfortable ride and modern infotainment and safety features that make it a strong choice for buyers wanting a practical yet stylish family crossover.

details
IMG_3964
IMG_3965

Reviews Omoda 9

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Tommy
11 Jun 2026, 08:29:12

I recently bought the Omoda 9 — it's a premium car at the right price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G9
Omoda 9
VS
The XPeng G9 and Omoda 9 are two electric SUVs that square off on range, tech features and overall value—each targets buyers who want a spacious, high-tech mid‑size EV. This short comparison will focus on their driving feel, interior quality, charging performance and pricing to help you pick the …
MG MGS9
Omoda 9
VS
The MG MGS9 and Omoda 9 are two bold, tech-focused SUVs from rising Chinese brands, both aimed at buyers who want roomy interiors, strong equipment levels and distinct styling without premium-brand prices. This comparison looks past the headlines to help you choose which one fits your …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage …
Audi Q5
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q5 is a well-rounded mid-size SUV that blends comfort, practicality and conventional petrol/diesel (or mild-hybrid) powertrains; the Audi Q6 e-tron is Audi’s fully electric premium SUV focused on range, advanced tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Choosing between them comes down to …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
BYD Sealion 7
Omoda 9
VS
The BYD Sealion 7 and Omoda 9 are direct rivals in the modern, tech-forward family car space, each promising strong value, roomy cabins and a long feature list. This comparison will help you see how the Sealion 7’s approach to efficiency and refinement stacks up against the Omoda 9’s emphasis on …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the Audi Q6 e-tron bring electric power to two distinct Audi philosophies: the Avant offers a low, aerodynamic touring wagon focused on efficiency and luggage capacity, while the Q6 e-tron is a higher-riding SUV that emphasizes space, visibility and everyday …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron and the Mercedes GLC represent two different takes on luxury midsize SUVs: the Q6 e-tron is Audi’s all-electric, tech-forward offering while the GLC is Mercedes’ established compact-luxury SUV available in conventional and electrified drivetrains. Choosing between them comes down …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
145 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
38 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
2,270 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
471 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
537 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
395 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Omoda
What drive types are available for the Audi Q6 e-tron?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.