The Audi Q6 e-tron and VW Tayron represent the latest advancements in electric mobility from their respective brands, showcasing distinctive designs and cutting-edge technology. While the Q6 e-tron boasts a more luxurious interior and a sportier driving experience, the Tayron offers practicality and a more accessible price point for everyday consumers. As both vehicles strive to cater to the evolving demands of environmentally conscious drivers, the choice between them ultimately comes down to personal preferences in style and functionality.
In the rapidly evolving automotive landscape, electric and hybrid vehicles are taking center stage, and two contenders leading the charge are the Audi Q6 e-tron and VW Tayron. Both vehicles fall into the SUV category but cater to different audiences and preferences. While the Q6 e-tron embraces a fully electric drivetrain, the Tayron offers a variety of powertrain options, including petrol, hybrid, and diesel, making this comparison all the more intriguing.
The Audi Q6 e-tron is powered by a fully electric engine, available in different configurations boasting power outputs ranging from 292 HP to a staggering 516 HP. The variations in torque are also impressive, with the higher-end models delivering up to 855 Nm. The Q6 e-tron accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.3 seconds, showcasing its performance pedigree.
On the other hand, the VW Tayron offers traditional combustion engines alongside a plugin hybrid option. With power outputs ranging between 150 HP and 272 HP, the Tayron appeals to a broader audience, providing customers the flexibility of choosing a powertrain that best suits their lifestyle. The Tayron also demonstrates impressive acceleration capabilities, reaching 0-100 km/h in 7.3 seconds for the more potent variants.
When it comes to efficiency, the Audi Q6 e-tron boasts a remarkable electric range of up to 656 km, making it a compelling choice for those who prioritize long journeys without the worry of frequent charging. Its consumption averages between 15.6 to 18.9 kWh/100 km, further emphasizing its energy-efficient engineering.
Conversely, the VW Tayron, with its hybrid and combustion options, offers different forms of fuel efficiency. The petrol and diesel variants achieve consumption figures between 6.2 to 6.4 L/100 km, while the plugin hybrid has an electric range of approximately 126 km. Although it doesn’t match the Q6 e-tron’s electric range, the Tayron’s versatility allows drivers to switch between fuel types based on availability and personal preference.
In terms of size, the Audi Q6 e-tron measures 4771 mm in length and features a trunk capacity of 526 liters, making it suitable for families and adventures alike. The electric SUV provides ample space for passengers and cargo, often making it a practical choice for today’s SUV buyers.
The VW Tayron, slightly longer at 4792 mm, offers a significantly larger trunk capacity, ranging from 705 to 885 liters, depending on the model. This added cargo space can be a deciding factor for families or individuals needing extra room for luggage or recreational gear.
Both the Q6 e-tron and Tayron come loaded with modern technology and premium interiors. The Audi Q6 e-tron’s cabin is equipped with high-quality materials, an advanced infotainment system, and numerous driver assistance features, merging comfort with cutting-edge technology.
The VW Tayron, while also offering a refined interior, incorporates a user-friendly interface and a robust selection of safety and connectivity features. The quality of materials is commendable, ensuring a pleasant driving experience without compromising on functionality.
Ultimately, the Audi Q6 e-tron and VW Tayron represent two different philosophies in modern SUV design. The Q6 e-tron is perfect for those seeking a luxury electric vehicle with extensive range and performance, while the Tayron provides versatility with its range of petrol, diesel, and hybrid options.
Both vehicles showcase their brands' commitment to innovation and quality, making this comparison less about which is better and more about which aligns best with your driving needs and lifestyle preferences. Whether you choose the fully electric Q6 e-tron or the multifaceted Tayron, you are sure to enjoy a remarkable driving experience.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 54400 - 91900
£
|
Price
about 39000 - 52600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 7.8
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
482 - 656
km
|
Electric Range
117 - 126
km
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
9 - 177
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425
kg
|
Curb weight
1682 - 1948
kg
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526
L
|
Trunk capacity
705 - 885
L
|
Length
4771
mm
|
Length
4792
mm
|
Width
1939 - 1965
mm
|
Width
1853 - 1866
mm
|
Height
1665 - 1685
mm
|
Height
1666 - 1668
mm
|
Payload
540
kg
|
Payload
489 - 566
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
292 - 516
HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 7
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
210 - 230
km/h
|
Max Speed
204 - 240
km/h
|
Torque
450 - 855
Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
215 - 380
kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
210 - 230
km/h
|
Top speed
204 - 240
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, F, G
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.