VS

Audi Q7 vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (507 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (70,600 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q7 or Nissan Interstar?

Audi Q7 vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Audi Q7

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably more efficient
details

Nissan Interstar

  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q7

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Interstar is considerably cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the Audi Q7 costs 70,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,469 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q7 uses 3.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers clearly more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 328 km more than the Audi Q7.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q7 offers substantially more power – delivering 507 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 337 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q7 delivers clearly more torque with 770 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 390 Nm more.

Q7

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Audi Q7 offers more seats – 7 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Interstar is very slightly lighter – 2,053 kg compared to 2,055 kg. The difference is around 2 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries noticeably more – 1,447 kg compared to 885 kg. That’s a difference of about 562 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q7 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £70,600
Q7

Audi Q7

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 231 - 507 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 11.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 81 - 82 km
Audi Q7
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q7

The Audi Q7 cuts an imposing figure on the road, balancing restrained luxury with a spacious, tech-rich cabin that makes long journeys feel effortless. It rides with confident composure and polished manners, so if you want a premium family SUV that feels grown-up and worth the badge, the Q7 is a persuasive choice — even the in-laws will be impressed.

details

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
Audi Q7
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

Price
70,600 - 100,600 £
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 11.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
81 - 82 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
86 - 271 g/km
co2
0 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,055 - 2,460 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
563 - 887 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,970 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
640 - 885 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
231 - 507 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 770 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
170 - 373 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,967 - 3,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.