Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or MINI Aceman?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Aceman is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,057 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 19.7 kWh/100km for the Audi Q8 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 5.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers significantly more range – reaching up to 595 km, about 240 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers substantially more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 245 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers significantly more torque with 973 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 623 Nm more.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is clearly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 865 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers significantly more boot space – 569 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 269 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries somewhat more – 595 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q8 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £65,100
Audi Q8 e-tron
Audi Q8 e-tron
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.