Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Mitsubishi Space Star?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 53,409 £.
Space Star
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers considerably more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 432 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 9.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi Q8 e-tron is noticeably faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 43 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q8 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 973 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 871 Nm more.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 1,645 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers significantly more boot space – 569 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 334 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers clearly more capacity – up to 1,637 L, about 725 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries visibly more – 595 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 195 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q8 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £65,100
Audi Q8 e-tron
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mitsubishi Space Star
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.