VS

BMW 4 Series Convertible vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (530 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (52,600 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 4 Series Convertible or VW T-Cross?

BMW 4 Series Convertible vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

BMW 4 Series Convertible

  • considerably more power
  • barely more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW T-Cross

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

4 Series Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the BMW 4 Series Convertible costs 52,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,234 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 4 Series Convertible uses 5.2 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 4 Series Convertible offers considerably more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 380 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 4 Series Convertible is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 4 Series Convertible delivers substantially more torque with 700 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.

4 Series Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: VW T-Cross offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is visibly lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,765 kg. The difference is around 498 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Cross offers moderately more boot space – 455 L compared to 385 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries a bit more – 480 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW 4 Series Convertible is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £52,600
4 Series Convertible

BMW 4 Series Convertible

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 530 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 10.2 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
BMW 4 Series Convertible
Mercedes CLE Convertible
VS
The BMW 4 Series Convertible and the Mercedes CLE Convertible go head-to-head as premium drop-top coupes, with the BMW known for taut, driver-focused handling and the CLE leaning into comfort, style, and advanced tech. Choose the 4 Series for a sharper, more engaging drive; opt for the CLE if you …
BMW 4 Series Convertible
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW 4 Series Convertible

The BMW 4 Series Convertible blends coupe-like elegance with open-top drama, its sleek profile and distinctive grille demanding attention whether the roof’s up or down. Behind the wheel it serves up taut handling and a refined ride, making it a rewarding choice for drivers who want sporty character without sacrificing everyday comfort — and yes, it looks spectacular when you drop the top.

details
P90400407_highRes_the-all-new-bmw-4-se
P90400400_highRes_the-all-new-bmw-4-se
P90400423_highRes_the-all-new-bmw-4-se
P90414434_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-con
P90133563_highRes_the-new-bmw-4-series

Reviews BMW 4 Series Convertible

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jarek
12 Sept 2026, 16:16:59

Very capable and well-built car. Good on the road, nicely quiet up to 100 km/h. Praise for the 1.5 TSI engine — very dynamic and very economical. Over a distance of 36,000 km the average fuel consumption is 6.2 liters per 100 km. Half on high-speed roads, half in the city. Driven with a heavy foot.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Cross
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross are direct rivals in the small crossover segment, offering compact, practical packaging and easy urban manners. This quick comparison cuts through the similarities to show which model is stronger on space, equipment, driving feel and value so you can pick the right …
Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Putting the Citroën C3 Aircross up against the VW T‑Cross pits a characterful, comfort-focused small SUV against a more conservative, all-round practical choice. Both target urban buyers who need space and versatility, but they differ in ride, interior quality and features—pick the C3 Aircross for …
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volkswagen T-Cross and T-Roc are compact SUVs that share family DNA but target different buyers. The T-Cross prioritizes urban practicality, low running costs and easy parking, while the T-Roc offers more interior space, stronger engine options and a sportier driving character.
Hyundai Bayon
VW T-Cross
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and VW T‑Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want small‑car agility with SUV practicality, easy city driving and low running costs. The Bayon punches above its weight on value, tech and bold styling, while the T‑Cross leans towards a more refined interior, …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Cross
VS
Comparing the SEAT Ateca and the VW T-Cross is essentially a choice between a more spacious, accomplished compact SUV and a smaller, city-focused crossover where maneuverability and value matter most. The Ateca delivers stronger performance, a more refined ride and greater practicality for …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and the VW T-Cross are two popular small SUVs that suit different needs: the Qashqai prioritises space, comfort and refinement, while the T-Cross offers compact practicality and strong value for city life. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the roomier, more …
VW T-Cross
VW Tiguan
VS
When comparing the VW T-Cross and VW Tiguan, both models offer the quintessential Volkswagen driving experience but cater to different needs. The T-Cross, being more compact, is perfect for urban environments with its nimble handling and practicality, while the Tiguan provides a roomier interior …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
BMW 4 Series Convertible
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
52,600 - 97,800 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 10.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
136 - 231 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,765 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
385 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,852 - 1,887 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
345 - 420 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 530 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 8.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 700 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 - 390 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the BMW 4 Series Convertible?

The BMW 4 Series Convertible is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.