VS

BMW 4 Series Coupe vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (530 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (46,200 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 4 Series Coupe or Volvo XC60?

BMW 4 Series Coupe vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

BMW 4 Series Coupe

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

4 Series Coupe

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BMW 4 Series Coupe is noticeably cheaper – starting at 46,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,077 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the BMW 4 Series Coupe with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 4 Series Coupe offers markedly more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 124 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 4 Series Coupe is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 4 Series Coupe delivers very slightly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 31 Nm more.

4 Series Coupe

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo XC60 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, BMW 4 Series Coupe is noticeably lighter – 1,600 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 550 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries a bit more – 510 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
BMW 4 Series Coupe
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW 4 Series Coupe

The BMW 4 Series Coupe blends aggressive styling with a driver-focused cabin, making even the humdrum commute feel like a short track day. It balances sharp handling and grown-up comfort with a dash of theatrical flair, so you get sportscar charisma without the drama of constant sacrifices.

details
P90405276_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405284_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405300_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405345_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc
P90405350_highRes_bmw-m440i-xdrive-arc

Reviews BMW 4 Series Coupe

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Shomguy
20 Jan 2026, 13:24:39

BMW is the best

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Safety

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Jakub
2 Jul 2026, 06:56:49

I own an XC60 2.4 D3 and I'm delighted. I suspect that later generations of the car are only better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
BMW 4 Series Coupe
BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe
VS
The BMW 4 Series Coupe and BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe look similar but serve different needs: the Coupe delivers a sharper, sportier two-door profile and a more focused driving feel, while the Gran Coupe blends 4 Series styling with four-door practicality and extra interior space. If you prioritise …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
BMW 4 Series Coupe
BMW Z4
VS
BMW 4 Series Coupe and BMW Z4 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW 4 Series Coupe or …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the Volvo XC60 pits a practical, value-focused compact crossover against a more premium, comfort- and safety-oriented compact SUV. If you prioritize everyday efficiency and sensible running costs the Qashqai is a smart, budget-friendly choice, while the XC60 suits …
BMW 4 Series Coupe
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
46,200 - 93,900 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 226 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,600 - 1,895 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,852 - 1,887 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
355 - 415 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 530 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 700 Nm
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 - 390 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
BMW
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the BMW 4 Series Coupe?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.