@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Nissan Qashqai vs Volvo XC60 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Two cars, one duel: Nissan Qashqai meets Volvo XC60.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

The Battle of the SUVs: Nissan Qashqai vs. Volvo XC60

When it comes to choosing an SUV that melds performance, comfort, and innovation, the Nissan Qashqai and Volvo XC60 emerge as prominent contenders. Each offers a unique blend of style and substance, catering to diverse driving preferences and needs. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two 2024 models, focusing on their technical aspects and innovations.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance

The Nissan Qashqai offers a versatile range of engine options, including petrol mild hybrids and full hybrids, with power outputs of 140, 158, and 190 HP. Its engines are paired with a choice of manual or automatic transmissions, with top speeds ranging from 170 to 206 km/h. The Qashqai's 0-100 km/h sprint time varies between 7.9 and 10.2 seconds, depending on the configuration. Notably, the Qashqai maintains a moderate fuel consumption of 5.1 to 6.8 L/100 km, supporting its appeal as an economical choice.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60 exudes power with its petrol mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid options, delivering between 250 to 455 HP. The XC60 exclusively features automatic transmissions and boasts all-wheel drive across all models. It's remarkably faster off the line than the Qashqai, with acceleration times from 4.9 to 6.9 seconds. The XC60 also benefits from a plug-in hybrid's electric range of up to 80 km, dramatically reducing its L/100 km consumption to as low as 0.9 L, making it an environmentally conscious option.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Ride Quality and Comfort

Both vehicles cater to a five-seat configuration, ensuring ample space for passengers. The Qashqai is slightly more compact with a length of 4425 mm and a width of 1835 mm, providing a comfortable and nimble urban driving experience. Its 504-liter trunk capacity is commendable for its class, offering practicality for families and travelers alike.

The Volvo XC60, on the other hand, is more imposing in stature with a length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm. With a slightly reduced trunk capacity of up to 483 liters, its luxurious interior compensates through premium materials and state-of-the-art infotainment systems, providing a distinctly refined ride.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

The Qashqai sets a good standard for CO₂ emissions, ranging from 116 to 154 g/km, aligning with moderate efficiency classes D and E. Its engines are efficient yet powerful, balancing performance with sustainability. With CO2 efficiency classes F and B, the XC60 shifts to more eco-conscious technology, especially with its plug-in hybrid variant emitting a mere 22 g/km of CO2, thanks to its ability to operate solely on electric power for substantial distances.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Innovation and Technological Edge

Nissan integrates its latest ProPILOT technology in the Qashqai, enhancing driving aids like traffic jam pilots and lane-keeping assists, catering to tech-savvy drivers. The 2024 model has an improved infotainment system with advanced connectivity options.

Volvo XC60 shines with its commitment to safety and innovation, featuring the Pilot Assist system that brings semi-autonomous driving capabilities to the forefront. The superior infotainment system powered by Google ensures a seamless integration with modern digital lifestyles.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Concluding Thoughts

Ultimately, the choice between the Nissan Qashqai and the Volvo XC60 hinges on personal preferences and priorities. The Qashqai presents itself as a capable, economical option for those seeking versatility and value. Conversely, the XC60 stands as a bastion of luxury and innovation, appealing to those who prioritize a powerful, eco-friendly drive with state-of-the-art features. Both remain strong contenders in the SUV market, ready to cater to the diverse demands of modern motorists.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Qashqai has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 19586 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a significantly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 250 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Nissan Qashqai performs somewhat better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls significantly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm difference.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is clearly perceptible lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 480 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers hardly perceptible more room – 504 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 21 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs minimal better – up to 1543 L, which is about 96 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 minimal takes the win – 550 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £49,200
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption

Price
29600 - 39900 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
102 - 154 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1835 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1625 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
466 - 520 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Volvo
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.