Compare performance (205 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Volvo XC60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to choosing an SUV that melds performance, comfort, and innovation, the Nissan Qashqai and Volvo XC60 emerge as prominent contenders. Each offers a unique blend of style and substance, catering to diverse driving preferences and needs. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two 2024 models, focusing on their technical aspects and innovations.
The Nissan Qashqai offers a versatile range of engine options, including petrol mild hybrids and full hybrids, with power outputs of 140, 158, and 190 HP. Its engines are paired with a choice of manual or automatic transmissions, with top speeds ranging from 170 to 206 km/h. The Qashqai's 0-100 km/h sprint time varies between 7.9 and 10.2 seconds, depending on the configuration. Notably, the Qashqai maintains a moderate fuel consumption of 5.1 to 6.8 L/100 km, supporting its appeal as an economical choice.
In contrast, the Volvo XC60 exudes power with its petrol mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid options, delivering between 250 to 455 HP. The XC60 exclusively features automatic transmissions and boasts all-wheel drive across all models. It's remarkably faster off the line than the Qashqai, with acceleration times from 4.9 to 6.9 seconds. The XC60 also benefits from a plug-in hybrid's electric range of up to 80 km, dramatically reducing its L/100 km consumption to as low as 0.9 L, making it an environmentally conscious option.
Both vehicles cater to a five-seat configuration, ensuring ample space for passengers. The Qashqai is slightly more compact with a length of 4425 mm and a width of 1835 mm, providing a comfortable and nimble urban driving experience. Its 504-liter trunk capacity is commendable for its class, offering practicality for families and travelers alike.
The Volvo XC60, on the other hand, is more imposing in stature with a length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm. With a slightly reduced trunk capacity of up to 483 liters, its luxurious interior compensates through premium materials and state-of-the-art infotainment systems, providing a distinctly refined ride.
The Qashqai sets a good standard for CO₂ emissions, ranging from 116 to 154 g/km, aligning with moderate efficiency classes D and E. Its engines are efficient yet powerful, balancing performance with sustainability. With CO2 efficiency classes F and B, the XC60 shifts to more eco-conscious technology, especially with its plug-in hybrid variant emitting a mere 22 g/km of CO2, thanks to its ability to operate solely on electric power for substantial distances.
Nissan integrates its latest ProPILOT technology in the Qashqai, enhancing driving aids like traffic jam pilots and lane-keeping assists, catering to tech-savvy drivers. The 2024 model has an improved infotainment system with advanced connectivity options.
Volvo XC60 shines with its commitment to safety and innovation, featuring the Pilot Assist system that brings semi-autonomous driving capabilities to the forefront. The superior infotainment system powered by Google ensures a seamless integration with modern digital lifestyles.
Ultimately, the choice between the Nissan Qashqai and the Volvo XC60 hinges on personal preferences and priorities. The Qashqai presents itself as a capable, economical option for those seeking versatility and value. Conversely, the XC60 stands as a bastion of luxury and innovation, appealing to those who prioritize a powerful, eco-friendly drive with state-of-the-art features. Both remain strong contenders in the SUV market, ready to cater to the diverse demands of modern motorists.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Qashqai is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,672 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 201 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers considerably more torque with 669 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 339 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is considerably lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 730 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries only slightly more – 516 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 152 g/km
|
co2
59 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
446 - 516 kg
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España