VS

Nissan Qashqai vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (205 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Volvo XC60?

Nissan Qashqai vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Volvo XC60

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai VS Volvo XC60 — quick take for buyers

Nissan Qashqai and Volvo XC60 sit in the same compact-SUV neighborhood but aim at different priorities: the Qashqai leans into quiet, EV‑like daily driving and practical tech, while the XC60 sells a more premium, composed long‑distance experience. The Qashqai feels engineered for urban comfort and straightforward usability, the Volvo for material quality, passenger calm and motorway refinement. That split — pragmatic, affordable comfort versus refined, higher‑grade luxury — defines most real‑world trade‑offs you’ll feel from day one. Read on to see which car’s compromises match your routine before you dive into the specs that follow.

XC60

Character and driving feel

The Nissan Qashqai brings an electric‑style smoothness to everyday driving: linear response, light steering and a relaxed demeanor that suits stop‑and‑go traffic and suburban errands. The Volvo XC60, by contrast, feels heavier and more planted; it trades some steering immediacy for a composed, confident presence at speed and on longer trips. If you want an SUV that hides its drivetrain and makes urban commuting effortless, the Qashqai is the clearer fit, whereas the XC60 rewards buyers who prioritise tranquillity and motorway stability over sporty feedback. Those who enjoy pushing an SUV through corners will find neither particularly sharp, but the XC60’s mass and suspension tuning make it the more serene cruiser of the two.

Qashqai

Comfort, cabin feel and perceived quality

Inside, the Volvo XC60 projects premium calm: thicker materials, classier finishes and seats designed for long hours make the cabin feel more upmarket than the Nissan Qashqai. The Qashqai’s interior is sensible and well put together, with practical touches like physical climate controls that make daily use less fiddly, but it lacks the tactile richness of the Volvo. Noise behaviour illustrates the split too — the Qashqai’s drivetrain is whisper‑quiet in town, while the XC60 keeps a lower overall noise level at sustained motorway speeds. In short, choose the Qashqai for pragmatic, comfortable ergonomics and the XC60 if a more luxurious, serene cabin matters most to you.

XC60

Usability and everyday tech

Both cars offer modern Google‑based infotainment, yet they present it differently in use: the Nissan Qashqai balances the touchscreen with helpful physical buttons, making quick adjustments less distracting. The Volvo XC60 integrates its functions more deeply into the touchscreen, which looks slick but can mean more menu diving for routine tasks like climate tweaks. Parking and visibility tip in the Qashqai’s favour with a very usable 360° camera system and easy manoeuvring, while the XC60 bundles a broader suite of safety assistants and a slightly more composed camera setup. The trade‑off is simple: Qashqai prioritises everyday convenience and low fuss, XC60 prioritises seamless integration and a premium software experience — at times with more touchscreen dependency.

Qashqai

Practicality, family use and luggage

For family routines the Nissan Qashqai excels at fuss‑free access: wide door openings, sensible ISOFIX placement and a layout that makes seat mounting and unloading straightforward for parents. The Volvo XC60 offers a more generous rear‑seat experience for two adults and a flatter, more usable load floor in many trim choices, but its boot is not class‑leading and PHEV variants reduce usable cargo space further. The Qashqai’s boot works well for everyday shopping and school runs, though a higher load lip and variable floor setups can complicate heavy loading. If you often pack for long trips or need the largest, flattest load area, the XC60’s practicality will feel more premium; if daily family life and easy entry/exit are your priorities, the Qashqai wins on convenience.

XC60

Who should choose which — buyer fit and next steps

Pick the Nissan Qashqai if your life is mostly urban and suburban: you’ll get a calm, efficient everyday driver with straightforward tech and a friendlier entry price that keeps running costs down. Opt for the Volvo XC60 if you value a high‑quality cabin, long‑distance comfort, and a premium safety package — and you’ll benefit most if you can make use of the XC60’s plug‑in capability for regular electric commuting. The trade‑off is clear: lower cost and pragmatic usability versus higher perceived quality and refinement for longer hauls. If you want the numbers and how they influence fuel use, acceleration and weight, the technical comparison that follows will map those differences onto real‑world outcomes so you can pick the better match for your calendar and wallet.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Qashqai

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Qashqai is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,672 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 201 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers considerably more torque with 669 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 339 Nm more.

Qashqai

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is considerably lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 730 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries only slightly more – 516 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
98 - 152 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,835 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
446 - 516 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.