Compare performance (601 HP vs 228 HP), boot space and price (60,800 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW i5 or Mercedes EQA?
The transition to electric mobility has seen manufacturers stepping up their game, offering innovative and efficient vehicles. In this comparison, we delve into the intricacies of the BMW i5 and the Mercedes EQA, two prominent contenders in the electric vehicle marketplace.
Both the BMW i5 and the Mercedes EQA display distinctive design languages that reflect their respective brand identities. The BMW i5’s sedan body combines sleek lines with a formidable stance, measuring 5060 mm in length, 1900 mm in width, and 1515 mm in height. This gives it a robust yet elegant presence on the road.
On the other hand, the Mercedes EQA is designed as a compact SUV, characterized by its sporty and modern silhouette. It is slightly shorter and wider at 4463 mm in length, 1834 mm in width, and up to 1613 mm in height, offering a more compact and agile profile compared to the i5.
Under the hood, the BMW i5 offers a powerhouse of options ranging from 340 HP to an impressive 601 HP. With a torque range from 430 Nm to a massive 820 Nm, the i5 runs on either rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive configurations. Its acceleration reaches 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.8 seconds, delivering thrilling performance.
The Mercedes EQA, while more modest in power, offers commendable outputs of 190 HP to 292 HP and torque readings from 385 Nm to 520 Nm. It comes in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive variants, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in 6 seconds at its peak performance level.
Efficiency is a key consideration for electric vehicles, and both models excel in their own rights. The BMW i5 boasts an electric range of up to 582 km with a consumption rate between 15.9 and 18.4 kWh/100 km, powered by an 81.2 kWh battery. This ensures that longer journeys are less stress-inducing with fewer stops for charging.
Conversely, the Mercedes EQA provides an electric range of up to 561 km, consuming between 14.4 and 16.9 kWh/100 km. Its battery capacity stands between 66.5 and 70.5 kWh. This highlights its efficiency, ideal for urban settings and eco-conscious drives.
Inside, both vehicles cater to comfort and sophistication. The i5, featuring a trunk capacity of 490 liters and seating for 5, emphasizes luxury with ample space for passengers and luggage. It exudes the classic BMW essence of premium craftsmanship.
The EQA, also seating 5, offers a trunk capacity of 340 liters but leverages its SUV design for higher ride height and visibility. Mercedes aims to combine practicality with luxury, ensuring a serene ride environment enhanced by the latest in automotive technology.
Choosing between the BMW i5 and the Mercedes EQA boils down to personal preference and usage scenarios. The i5, with its superior power and range, suits those seeking performance and long-distance driving. Meanwhile, the EQA is the more pragmatic choice for those valuing efficiency and urban maneuverability with a stylish edge.
Both vehicles reflect the future of electrified driving, showcasing pioneering advancements that uphold the legacy and innovation that BMW and Mercedes-Benz represent.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQA is noticeably cheaper – starting at 45,900 £ , while the BMW i5 costs 60,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,897 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BMW i5 is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW i5 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 627 km, about 151 km more than the Mercedes EQA.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW i5 offers substantially more power – delivering 601 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 373 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW i5 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW i5 delivers considerably more torque with 820 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 430 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQA is barely lighter – 2,115 kg compared to 2,195 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW i5 offers clearly more boot space – 490 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 150 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW i5 carries noticeably more – 545 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.
The BMW i5 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW i5 swaps predictable executive-car manners for a confident electric vibe, marrying refined comfort with surprisingly engaging steering. It’s a practical choice that doesn’t feel dull, offering the kind of clean, premium experience that makes commuting feel like a small indulgence.
details
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
60,800 - 85,900 £
|
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
540 - 627 km
|
Electric Range
476 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,195 - 2,370 kg
|
Curb weight
2,115 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
525 - 545 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 601 HP
|
Power HP
228 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 - 820 Nm
|
Torque
390 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 442 kW
|
Power kW
168 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España