Compare performance (228 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 31,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Tesla Model 3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the growing landscape of electric vehicles (EVs), the Mercedes EQA and Tesla Model 3 stand out as two prominent options that represent a clash of luxury and technological innovation. Both vehicles have much to offer; however, they cater to different preferences and driving experiences. In this comparison, we will dissect their technical specifications, performance metrics, and innovative features that set them apart.
The Mercedes EQA is styled as a compact SUV, offering a more elevated driving position and a rugged presence that appeals to those who appreciate utility alongside luxury. With a length of 4,463 mm, a width of 1,834 mm, and a height that varies from 1,608 to 1,613 mm, it is designed to combine elegance with practicality.
On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 is a sleek hatchback, exuding a sporty aesthetic with its aerodynamic lines. Measuring 4,720 mm in length, 1,850 mm in width, and 1,440 mm in height, the Model 3 offers a more low-slung, dynamic appearance that appeals to performance-oriented drivers.
When it comes to powertrains, both vehicles are equipped with electric engines that provide impressive performance figures. The Mercedes EQA offers variants with power outputs ranging from 190 HP to a robust 292 HP, with torque figures peaking at 520 Nm. The acceleration times are commendable, with the fastest EQA variant sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 6 seconds.
In contrast, the Tesla Model 3 raises the stakes with power outputs ranging from 283 HP to a staggering 460 HP. With torque reaching up to 723 Nm, it outpaces the EQA considerably, achieving 0 to 100 km/h acceleration as fast as 3.1 seconds in its Performance variant.
Efficiency is crucial when it comes to EVs, and both the EQA and Model 3 excel in this area. The Mercedes EQA showcases an electric range of up to 561 km, depending on the variant, with energy consumption as low as 14.4 kWh/100km, making it a commendable choice for daily use.
However, the Tesla Model 3 takes efficiency a step further with an impressive range of up to 702 km in its Long Range version, with the most efficient variant consuming only 12.5 kWh/100km. This efficiency can translate into longer trips with less frequent charging, giving the Model 3 a distinct edge in range anxiety.
The cabin of the Mercedes EQA focuses on luxury and comfort, boasting a refined interior design with high-quality materials and ample space for up to five passengers. The EQA features a digital dashboard with a large central display for infotainment, alongside advanced driver-assistance systems that enhance safety and convenience.
On the flip side, the Tesla Model 3 boasts a minimalist interior dominated by a central touchscreen that controls nearly all vehicle functions. While some may find this unconventional, it underscores Tesla's commitment to simplifying user interfaces. The Model 3 is also equipped with advanced autopilot capabilities, providing a unique driving experience with semi-autonomous features.
Both the Mercedes EQA and Tesla Model 3 support fast charging capabilities; however, Tesla's Supercharger network remains unparalleled, offering convenience for long-distance travelers. The Model 3's battery capacity ranges from 62 kWh to 79 kWh, ensuring versatility in urban and highway charging scenarios.
The EQA, with battery capacities of 66.5 kWh and 70.5 kWh, is also competitive, but it may not have the extensive charging infrastructure of Tesla. Nevertheless, it reasonably accommodates everyday driving needs with a trunk capacity of up to 340 liters, while the Tesla Model 3 offers a superior 594 liters, providing practicality for more substantial cargo loads.
The choice between the Mercedes EQA and Tesla Model 3 ultimately hinges on personal preferences and driving needs. The Mercedes EQA offers luxury and utility with a well-crafted design, appealing to those who prioritize comfort and style in their electric SUV. In contrast, the Tesla Model 3 leads with unparalleled efficiency, cutting-edge technology, and outstanding performance that caters to driving enthusiasts.
Whether you lean toward the elegance of the EQA or the innovation of the Model 3, both vehicles represent the future of automotive excellence in the electric arena.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Tesla Model 3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 31,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,169 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model 3 is visibly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 3.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 750 km, about 274 km more than the Mercedes EQA.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers considerably more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 232 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Tesla Model 3 delivers significantly more torque with 660 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is slightly lighter – 1,822 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 293 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers considerably more boot space – 594 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 254 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQA carries markedly more – 425 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 92 kg.
The Tesla Model 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
The Tesla Model 3 is a compact electric sedan that pairs brisk, responsive driving with a sleek, minimalist cabin and intuitive, software-led features. It makes a practical, modern choice for daily commutes and long-term ownership while emphasizing simplicity and advanced driver assistance.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
|
Price
31,700 - 50,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
476 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,115 kg
|
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
302 - 333 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
228 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
390 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
168 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España