VS

BMW X1 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (326 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (38,700 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X1 or Mazda CX-80?

BMW X1 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

BMW X1

4.3 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X1

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BMW X1 is markedly cheaper – starting at 38,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,671 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X1 uses 2.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW X1 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 81 km, about 21 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers barely more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 326 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers somewhat more torque with 550 Nm compared to 477 Nm. That’s about 73 Nm more.

X1

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, BMW X1 is markedly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 556 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers substantially more boot space – 540 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 282 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X1 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,700
X1

BMW X1

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 326 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 81 km
BMW X1
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW X1

The BMW X1 delivers BMW's sporty driving character in a compact premium crossover package, making daily driving both engaging and practical. With a refined cabin, flexible cargo space and composed handling, it's a smart choice for buyers who want luxury and versatility without compromise.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
BMW X1
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,700 - 56,200 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
81 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
57 - 175 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
490 - 500 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.