In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct offerings. The X1 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging driving dynamics, while the XC60 captivates with its elegant design and emphasis on safety features. Ultimately, the choice between these two premium models will depend on whether buyers prioritize performance or comfort and technology.
In the world of compact SUVs, the competition is fierce, particularly between two of the most acclaimed brands: BMW and Volvo. The BMW X1 and the Volvo XC60 offer not only compelling aesthetics but also a multitude of technical innovations and powertrains that can entice potential buyers. In this article, we will dive deep into a detailed comparison of these two renowned models, examining their technical aspects, innovations, and what sets them apart.
The BMW X1 is a well-regarded compact SUV boasting a blend of driving performance and practicality. With a range of powertrains, including petrol, diesel, mild-hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options, the X1 caters to varied preferences. It offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations, enhancing its adaptability in different driving conditions.
Under the hood, the X1 is equipped with engine options that range from 150 to 326 horsepower, depending on the variant chosen. It demonstrates impressive fuel efficiency, with consumption rates varying from 4.6 to 7.7 liters per 100 km, depending on the engine configuration. The BMW X1 also offers swift acceleration, with the top-performing version reaching 0-100 km/h in just 5.4 seconds, showcasing its sporty nature.
Interior comfort is paramount in the BMW X1, which accommodates five passengers. With a trunk capacity of up to 540 liters, it outshines many competitors in terms of practicality. Additionally, the vehicle’s dimensions of 4500 mm in length and 1845 mm in width provide ample space and a commanding road presence.
Equipped with the latest BMW iDrive technology, the X1 seamlessly integrates connectivity and infotainment, offering a user-friendly experience. Additionally, advanced driver assistance systems, such as lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control, elevate safety and convenience for drivers.
On the other end, the Volvo XC60 is known for its Scandinavian design, premium materials, and high safety ratings. As a mid-size SUV, it provides a more spacious feel and is designed with comfort and elegance in mind.
The XC60 offers fewer engine options, focusing primarily on petrol mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, with power outputs ranging from 250 to an impressive 455 horsepower. While it has a higher fuel consumption rate of 7.7 L/100 km, it compensates with potent performance, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.9 seconds in the top trim. However, its maximum speed is capped at 180 km/h.
The XC60 marries luxury with practicality, offering a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 483 liters when compared to the X1. Nevertheless, with its overall length of 4688 mm and a width of 1902 mm, the XC60 provides a spacious interior designed for modern comforts.
Volvo’s commitment to safety is legendary, and the XC60 is a testament to that with its suite of advanced safety features, including automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and a comprehensive suite of airbags. Moreover, an intuitive infotainment system anchored by a large vertical touchscreen enhances user experience and connectivity.
Both the BMW X1 and Volvo XC60 are formidable contenders in their class, each offering distinct advantages. The X1 leans more towards sporty performance and practicality, making it an engaging drive, while the XC60 focuses on luxurious comfort and unmatched safety features, appealing to families and those prioritizing premium experiences. Ultimately, your choice between these two vehicles will depend on your specific needs and preferences, but in either case, you're likely to end up with a well-rounded, capable SUV.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 37600 - 54800
£
|
Price
about 48800 - 74600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 7.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 7.7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
83
km
|
Electric Range
79 - 80
km
|
Battery Capacity
14.2
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.7
kWh
|
co2
17 - 175
g/km
|
co2
22 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 - 54
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1575 - 1935
kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150
kg
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540
L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483
L
|
Length
4500 - 4505
mm
|
Length
4688
mm
|
Width
1845
mm
|
Width
1902
mm
|
Height
1622 - 1642
mm
|
Height
1658
mm
|
Payload
490 - 500
kg
|
Payload
510 - 550
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
136 - 326
HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9
s
|
Max Speed
190 - 250
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
230 - 477
Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
100 - 240
kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335
kW
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
190 - 250
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.