VS

BMW X3 vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (398 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (51,700 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Nissan Qashqai?

BMW X3 vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

X3

Introduction: A Battle of SUVs

The SUV segment is consistently evolving, bringing together cutting-edge technologies, superior performance, and impressive comfort. In the battle of the compact SUVs, the BMW X3 and the Nissan Qashqai are two notable contenders, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. This article aims to compare these two popular models based on technical aspects, performance, and innovative features that set them apart in the automotive market.

Qashqai

Performance and Engine Options

The BMW X3 offers an extensive range of engine options, from efficient diesel mild-hybrid variants to high-performance petrol engines, including plug-in hybrids. With power outputs ranging from 190 HP to a whopping 510 HP, the X3 caters to various driving dynamics and preferences. Its acceleration profiles are equally impressive, with some models capable of hitting 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.8 seconds. This performance is complemented by an all-wheel-drive system that enhances its handling and grip.

In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai presents a more modest lineup, focusing primarily on fuel efficiency and everyday usability. Its hybrid powertrain includes petrol mild-hybrids and full hybrids, producing up to 190 HP. With a top acceleration of 7.9 seconds for the sportiest variant, the Qashqai provides a solid driving experience, albeit with less power than the X3.

X3

Fuel Efficiency: Economy Meets Performance

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the BMW X3 boasts impressive figures, especially in its hybrid variants, achieving consumption ratings as low as 2.1 L/100km. This makes it an attractive choice for those seeking powerful performance without compromising on eco-friendliness. The car’s CO2 emissions vary depending on the configuration but can go as low as 21 g/km in its hybrid form, showcasing its innovative engineering.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai focuses on accessible fuel efficiency, offering consumption rates as low as 5.1 L/100km. While these figures are commendable, with CO2 emissions of around 116 g/km, the Qashqai's performance is slightly less thrilling, making it more suited for urban commuting than spirited driving.

Qashqai

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both vehicles sport spacious interiors, but the X3 leans more towards luxury with high-quality materials, refined finishes, and advanced technology. The trunk capacity of 550 L to 570 L provides ample room for luggage, making long trips more convenient. Additionally, the X3 is equipped with BMW's cutting-edge infotainment system, featuring a user-friendly interface, smartphone integration, and a suite of driver-assistance technologies.

The Nissan Qashqai, although not as luxurious as the X3, still offers a comfortable cabin with decent space and a respectable trunk capacity of 479 L to 504 L. The Qashqai comes with a straightforward infotainment system and essential safety features, appealing to practical buyers who prioritize functionality over luxury.

X3

Safety Innovations

Both the BMW X3 and Nissan Qashqai come with robust safety features and a commitment to protecting passengers. The X3 is equipped with an extensive array of driver-assistance technologies, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automated emergency braking, which can be critical in preventing collisions.

The Qashqai also offers many safety systems, such as intelligent emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and traffic sign recognition, positioning it well within its segment. This focus on safety makes both options suitable for families and safety-conscious drivers.

Qashqai

Conclusion: Which SUV to Choose?

In conclusion, choosing between the BMW X3 and Nissan Qashqai largely depends on the buyer’s preferences and priorities. The X3 excels in performance, luxury, and advanced technology, making it a worthy investment for those seeking a high-end SUV experience. Meanwhile, the Qashqai shines in practicality and fuel efficiency, appealing to budget-conscious consumers who desire a comfortable and reliable vehicle for daily use.

Ultimately, both SUVs hold their ground effectively in the competitive automotive landscape. Whether you prioritize power and luxury or efficiency and practicality, the BMW X3 and Nissan Qashqai deliver compelling features to meet diverse consumer needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Qashqai is significantly cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,080 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X3 uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers considerably more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 193 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers clearly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is markedly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,930 kg. The difference is around 510 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X3 offers a bit more boot space – 570 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW X3 carries marginally more – 570 kg compared to 516 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,700
X3

BMW X3

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 398 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 88 km
BMW X3
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW X3

The BMW X3 blends sporty handling with premium comfort, making it a strong choice for drivers who want an engaging everyday SUV. Its well-appointed interior and confident road manners give it broad appeal for families and commuters who value style and versatility.

details

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details
BMW X3
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption

Price
51,700 - 73,000 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
98 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
570 kg
Payload
446 - 516 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
BMW
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.