Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: BMW X5 or Mazda CX-60?
In the dynamic world of modern SUVs, the BMW X5 and the Mazda CX-60 stand out as compelling choices. Both models come packed with an array of technical innovations and features designed to provide a superior driving experience. Here, we delve into a detailed comparison to determine which SUV emerges on top.
The BMW X5 offers a varied lineup with diesel, petrol, and plug-in hybrid engines, all coupled with an automatic gearbox. Its most powerful variant churns out an impressive 625 HP with a 4395 cm3 engine, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in a staggering 3.9 seconds. This beast of a vehicle also boasts an electric range of up to 97 km, thanks to its 25.7 kWh battery.
The Mazda CX-60, on the other hand, brings an engaging mix of plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV engines. Its top-tier plug-in hybrid engine offers 327 HP and accelerates to 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds, complemented by an electric range of 64 km. With a maximum speed of 219 km/h, the CX-60 provides a balanced blend of performance and efficiency.
BMW's extensive powertrain lineup showcases a diverse range of fuel consumption figures. The plug-in hybrid variant shines with a consumption of just 0.9 L/100 km and CO2 emissions of 21 g/km. The diesel models, however, still provide commendable efficiency with around 7.4 to 7.6 L/100 km.
The Mazda CX-60 delivers impressive fuel efficiency with its plug-in hybrid model consuming merely 1.4 L/100 km and CO2 emissions of 32 g/km. Even the diesel variant presents an attractive option with a consumption of 5.4 L/100 km, making the CX-60 a prudent choice for eco-conscious buyers.
Space is a critical factor when choosing a family SUV. The BMW X5, with its slightly larger dimensions, offers a trunk capacity of 650 liters, allowing ample room for luggage and gear. The luxurious interior accommodations make it a splendid choice for comfortable journeys.
Mazda's CX-60, while slightly more compact, still provides a generous 570-liter trunk and a well-appointed cabin. Mazda's flair for elegant, driver-focused displays ensures a premium feel throughout, despite its smaller stance compared to the BMW X5.
Ultimately, the choice between the BMW X5 and the Mazda CX-60 will hinge on individual priorities. The BMW X5 caters to drivers seeking peak performance and a more extensive array of powerful engines with a decidedly premium touch. In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 provides a balanced blend of efficiency and practicality, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers who also value style.
Both the BMW X5 and Mazda CX-60 exhibit compelling strengths, demonstrating how innovation and design cater to diverse driving needs. Whichever path you choose, both SUVs promise to deliver remarkable driving experiences that resonate with today's automotive enthusiasts.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-60 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the BMW X5 costs 77100 £. That’s a price difference of around 35152 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the BMW X5 with 3 L. The difference is about 1.60 L per 100 km.
As for range, the BMW X5 performs distinct better – achieving up to 105 km, about 41 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X5 has a decisively edge – offering 625 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 298 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X5 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW X5 performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW X5 pulls evident stronger with 750 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2240 kg. The difference is around 350 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW X5 offers a bit more room – 650 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW X5 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1870 L, which is about 144 L more than the Mazda CX-60.
When it comes to payload, BMW X5 a bit takes the win – 705 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 93 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be has a very small edge and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The BMW X5 blends athletic handling with a roomy, premium interior, feeling equally at home on twisty country roads and the school-run car park. Its executive-lounge cabin and confident road presence make it a tempting choice for buyers who want comfort, capability and just a little bit of bragging rights.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
77100 - 143500 £
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 12.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
105 km
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
25.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
68 - 289 g/km
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2240 - 2495 kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 650 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4935 - 4948 mm
|
Length
4745 mm
|
|
Width
2004 - 2015 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1755 - 1765 mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1720 - 1870 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
|
Payload
565 - 705 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
298 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
233 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
540 - 750 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
219 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2993 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The BMW X5 is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España