VS

BMW X5 vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (625 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (77,100 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X5 or MG HS?

BMW X5 vs MG HS: Key differences

BMW X5

3.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • only slightly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

MG HS

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the BMW X5 costs 77,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 47,066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG HS uses 0.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the BMW X5 with 3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW X5 offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 105 km, about 5 km more than the MG HS.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X5 offers considerably more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X5 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the MG HS takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X5 delivers significantly more torque with 750 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.

X5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is visibly lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 2,240 kg. The difference is around 505 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X5 offers visibly more boot space – 650 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW X5 carries clearly more – 705 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 305 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG HS stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
HS

MG HS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 224 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal and the MG HS puts a modern electric fastback (the BYD Seal) up against a traditional compact SUV (the MG HS) that prioritizes practicality and interior space. This quick guide focuses on real-world driving feel, running costs, tech and ownership considerations so you can …
BMW X5
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW X5

The BMW X5 blends athletic handling with a roomy, premium interior, feeling equally at home on twisty country roads and the school-run car park. Its executive-lounge cabin and confident road presence make it a tempting choice for buyers who want comfort, capability and just a little bit of bragging rights.

details
P90422226_highRes_bmw-x5-xdrive45e-05-
P90374943_highRes_the-new-bmw-x5-xdriv
P90374950_highRes_the-new-bmw-x5-xdriv
P90374994_highRes_the-new-bmw-x5-xdriv
P90375014_highRes_the-new-bmw-x5-xdriv

Reviews BMW X5

3.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
Kazibwe Patrick
21 Apr 2026, 11:42:53

Very Good

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
Dacia Bigster
MG HS
VS
This comparison pits the Dacia Bigster against the MG HS to help real buyers choose between a rugged, value-focused family SUV and a more polished, feature-rich rival. The Bigster prioritises low running costs, robustness and space, while the MG HS offers greater refinement, kit and driving comfort …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
BMW iX3
BMW X5
VS
Meet the BMW iX3 and the BMW X5: the iX3 is BMW’s quietly efficient all-electric mid-size SUV, while the X5 is the brand’s imposing, go-anywhere luxury SUV with traditional petrol and diesel power. Choosing between them is simple — a city-smart, lower-cost, instant-torque electric every day, or a …
BYD Atto 2
MG HS
VS
The BYD Atto 2 and MG HS both aim at buyers wanting a compact SUV, but they take very different approaches — the Atto 2 is an electric, tech-forward crossover, while the MG HS is a conventional petrol-powered family SUV focused on space and value. This comparison will help you weigh EV range, …
Kia Sportage
MG HS
VS
Two likeable compact crossovers go head-to-head: the well-rounded Kia Sportage versus the value-packed MG HS and its electrified twin, the EHS. Which wins on everyday practicality, kit and style — and which one is the clever buy for your driveway and wallet?
MG HS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Think of the MG HS (and its EHS plug‑in hybrid) as the sensible, budget‑friendly family SUV — roomy, comfortable and annoyingly practical — while the MG MGS5 EV flips the script with instant electric torque, sharper handling and far more tech for your money. Pick the HS/EHS if you want proven value …
MG ZS
MG HS
VS
The MG ZS and MG HS are closely related SUVs that target buyers seeking compact practicality and modern features without luxury-car prices. The ZS emphasises affordability and efficient urban use, while the HS offers more space, stronger engines and extra equipment, so your choice comes down to …
BMW X5
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
Price
77,100 - 143,500 £
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
3 - 12.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
105 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
68 - 289 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,240 - 2,495 kg
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Trunk capacity
500 - 650 L
Trunk capacity
507 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,004 - 2,015 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
565 - 705 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
298 - 625 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
540 - 750 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
219 - 460 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
2,993 - 4,395 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
BMW
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the BMW X5?

The BMW X5 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.