VS

BMW XM vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (748 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (116,100 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Honda CR-V?

BMW XM vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

BMW XM

  • considerably more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • significantly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XM

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Honda CR-V is substantially cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the BMW XM costs 116,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 73,371 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the BMW XM with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW XM offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 80 km, about 2 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM offers considerably more power – delivering 748 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 564 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 5.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW XM delivers clearly more torque with 1,000 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 665 Nm more.

XM

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: BMW XM offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is significantly lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 874 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers slightly more boot space – 617 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW XM carries marginally more – 525 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW XM is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £116,100
XM

BMW XM

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 476 - 748 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 78 - 80 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
BMW XM
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW XM

The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.

details
P90478657_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478646_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478549_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478580_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x

Reviews BMW XM

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Lexus NX stand out for their unique strengths. While the CR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious feel and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Ford Kuga
Honda CR-V
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga stands out with its sporty design and agile handling, offering a dynamic driving experience that appeals to enthusiasts. In contrast, the Honda CR-V impresses with its reputation for reliability and spacious interior, making it a family-friendly …
Honda CR-V
Mercedes GLC
VS
In the competitive cross-over landscape, the Honda CR-V and Mercedes GLC both offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Honda CR-V stands out with its practicality, excellent fuel economy, and affordable pricing, making it an ideal choice for families seeking reliability without breaking the …
Honda CR-V
Nissan X-Trail
VS
The Honda CR-V and Nissan X-Trail are two strong contenders in the compact SUV segment, each offering a blend of comfort, practicality, and technology. While the CR-V is known for its spacious interior and reliability, the X-Trail impresses with its off-road capabilities and innovative safety …
Honda CR-V
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Honda CR-V and VW Tayron stand out for their unique strengths. The CR-V is celebrated for its spacious interior and reliability, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Tayron impresses with its sleek design and advanced tech features, …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Karoq
VS
Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the Skoda Karoq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
BMW XM
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
116,100 - 159,300 £
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 - 80 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 119 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,695 - 2,795 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
527 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,005 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 525 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
700 - 1,000 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
2,998 - 4,395 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
BMW
Brand
Honda
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.