VS

BMW XM vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (748 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (116,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW XM or Nissan Juke?

BMW XM vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

BMW XM

  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XM

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Juke is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the BMW XM costs 116,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 94,757 £.

Both cars consume an average of 4.7 L/100km – no difference here.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW XM offers considerably more power – delivering 748 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 605 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW XM is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW XM delivers considerably more torque with 1,000 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 800 Nm more.

XM

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: BMW XM offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is substantially lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 1,421 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW XM offers moderately more boot space – 527 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW XM carries slightly more – 525 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 98 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW XM shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £116,100
XM

BMW XM

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 476 - 748 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 78 - 80 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
BMW XM
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW XM

The BMW XM is an unapologetically bold flagship that fuses brash, hyper-styled presence with the kind of luxury that commands attention wherever it goes. Inside it's a leather-clad showpiece loaded with modern tech and a driving personality that blends theatrical muscle with refined grand-tourer composure—ideal for buyers who want drama and comfort in equal measure.

details
P90478657_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478646_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478549_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x
P90478580_lowRes_the-first-ever-bmw-x

Reviews BMW XM

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Juke
VS
The Kona and the Juke are two of the most popular subcompact crossovers, each standing out with bold styling and a city-friendly footprint. This quick comparison looks at how the Kona and Juke stack up on comfort, practicality, performance and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Comparing the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris Cross helps buyers choose between two compact crossovers with different strengths: the Juke offers bold styling and a punchy, fun-to-drive character, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes refinement, efficiency and everyday practicality. I’ll walk you …
Nissan Juke
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Nissan Juke and Peugeot 2008 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving experiences. The Juke offers a sportier edge with its agile handling and bold styling, while the 2008 impresses with a refined interior and advanced technology …
Nissan Juke
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Nissan Juke and Nissan Qashqai represent two distinct approaches to the crossover market, appealing to different drivers with their unique designs and features. While the Juke boasts a bold, sporty aesthetic and agile handling, the Qashqai prioritizes practicality and comfort, making it a …
Nissan Juke
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Nissan Juke and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinctive designs and dynamic performance. The Juke’s bold styling and spirited driving experience appeal to those seeking a sportier vibe, while the T-Cross offers practicality and a spacious interior, …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
BMW XM
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
116,100 - 159,300 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 - 80 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 119 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,695 - 2,795 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
527 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,005 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 525 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
476 - 748 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
700 - 1,000 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
350 - 550 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
2,998 - 4,395 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
BMW
Brand
Nissan
What drive types are available for the BMW XM?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.